Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50348

Commentaire fait au nom

Carden Field Naturalists

Statut du commentaire

Carden Field Naturalists does not support the government’s plan to proceed with implementing the Fund. It will lead to an increase in habitat loss and degradation, a primary threat to most of the Fund species. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50351

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Re: ERO 019-2636 Species at Risk Conservation Fund We have just been made aware of the new proposed Species at Risk Conservation Fund. To a reader of “headlines” this sounds like a good idea, but any sensible person would read the details and even read between the lines. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50364

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am against this fund, because its long term negative effects far outweigh the short term positive ones. Developers will be allowed to pay away the harm they do to the environment. This encourages a broader use of risky offsets for threatened and endangered species. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50367

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for the opportunity to provide my comments. These comments come from the perspective of an environmental consultant who as has worked with many different clients in the implementation of numerous ESA authorizations. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50373

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal is effectively a pay-to-kill system in which those with enough money will be able to walk away from destroying essential habitats and environments of at risk species with no more than a lighter pocket. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50374

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am against this idea for the following reasons: * The Fund will lead to increased habitat loss and degradation - a primary threat to many endangered species! * The Fund is likely to encourage the broader use of risky offsets for threatened and endangered species Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50375

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

These proposed changes are unacceptable and completely contrary to the purpose of the Endangered Species Act. Paying into a fund, which is managed by the same corruption that created it, is not the same as preserving individuals of a species. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50376

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The concept of paying to have the privilege of destroying important habitat for endangered species is bizarre! Important habitat needs to be protected not destroyed. Please do not go ahead with this legislation. It represents all that is wrong with a completely business oriented government. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50380

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support the government’s plan to proceed with implementing the Fund. It will lead to an increase in habitat loss and degradation which is a primary threat to species at risk. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50381

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We are supportive of the proposed amendments to the Endangered Species Act, R.S.O. 2007, as outlined in ERO 019-2636. We agree the Species at Risk Conservation Fund concept will help streamline authorizations and development projects, while also serving to appropriately protect species at risk. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50384

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am concerned that the proposed changes to ESA will have negative affects to those species listed. Paying into fund will make it easier for developers to destroy habitat. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50385

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support this proposal. It will result in developers simply paying money into a fund and absolving themselves of all responsibility for negative environmental and social impacts to watersheds, municipalites, and species at risk. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50386

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support this proposal. As a resident of Ontario I do not believe that the intentions of this proposal is to protect species at risk.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50391

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello, How exactly will companies be reprimanded for excessive destruction of species at risk? What happens if the fund runs out? How will you regulate companies so they are not destructively expanding areas that may be locally or regionally important to certain species? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50400

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Friends of The Spit oppose the proposed “new regulations to enable use of the Species at Risk Conservation Fund (the Fund) and to establish a provincial agency to administer the Fund”. Lire davantage