Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69111

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

November 8, 2022 Re: Bill 23 More Homes Built Faster (ERO 019-2927, 019-6141, and 019-6162) Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69137

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Restricting conservation authorities' abilities to protect the environment will be disastrous . Much of the development pressure we see today is occurring within the Carolinian woodlands region: the most biodiverse ecozone occupied by Canada. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69153

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support this proposal because protecting our environment should be the top of our priorities right now. We only get 1 earth. Developing environmentally protected lands is dangerous.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69326

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Farmland Trust

Statut du commentaire

The Ontario Farmland Trust (OFT) recommends that all proposed changes to the Conservation Authorities Act are revoked. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69574

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It seems that the role would be shifting to the municipalities which do not have the staff to support their reviews that Conservation Authorities perform, such as water resources engineering, watershed monitoring, environmental planning and regulatory compliance. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69581

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I've been a civil engineer in Ontario for almost 20 years (working mostly with developers), and these changes to Conservation Authorities (CAs) are a terrible idea. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69589

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a landowner I agree with these changes as the CA that covers us is dishonest and causes huge delays and buffers around PSWs that are not PSWs and they charge huge fees. My neighbour paid 2000$ for an above ground pool as conservation said his backyard was next to a wetland. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69595

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I support these changes because the changes are providing a solid foundation to address Ontario’s housing supply crisis over the long term and will be supplemented by continued action in the future.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69649

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

DO NOT MAKE CHANGES TO THE Conservation Authorities Act Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69827

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The changes you have proposed to Bill 23 are not required and will jeopardize the integrity of the landscape, without doing much to address the housing issues. Density works and is cheaper. No more sprawl ! I am a taxpayer and voter and am strongly opposed to these changes !

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70051

Commentaire fait au nom

Ausable Bayfield Conservation Authority

Statut du commentaire

Re: Proposed Bill 23 - More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 - Schedule 2 This letter is the Ausable Bayfield Conservation Authority response to Bill 23, More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022, specifically regarding Schedule 2. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70259

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 23, the "More Homes, Less Environment Act" will be very bad for the environment as it will prevent Conservation Authorities from providing the essential services of reviewing development proposals. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70309

Commentaire fait au nom

Township of Puslinch

Statut du commentaire

The Township of Puslinch formal comments regarding the Bill 23 Proposed Legislative changes are attached for consideration. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70469

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am deeply concerned about the proposed changes outlined in Bill 23. Our conservation authorities do a crucial job of protecting the natural environment, and their mandate goes FAR beyond protecting Ontario's citizens from natural disasters. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70525

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I know that this is about building homes and that farm businesses are an unintended beneficiary of bill 23 changes to the conservation authorities. But do not back down on these changes. We beg you!!!!! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70589

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I oppose any proposals that reduce the power of the Conservation Authorities, especially for development. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71316

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is something you should never even consider. We all need more green space even if it's just for our mental health. Taking away the conservation authority's ability to protect it's citizens as well as the ecosystem and protection of natural areas for wildlife is essential. Lire davantage