Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64188

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have voted conservative in every election since I turned 18 years old. I will not vote for provincial conservatives again if one single acre of the greenbelt is sold off. This is the blatant type of corporate corruption that goes on within the LPC. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64191

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64195

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hamilton does not need to expand. It needs to grow up, not out. There is plenty of undeveloped and underdeveloped areas in the city that can be used to build the necessary housing.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64196

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a short-sighted plan purporting to solve a long-term issue. In 3-4 decades, when Canada has a significantly larger population, we will heavily rely on arable land like the Greenbelt to produce enough food. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64198

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Why destroy protected lands when we have plenty of space for development in and around the GTA? What will destroying the green belt do besides feed Fords developer buddies? Will we be building schools, hospitals, roads, services, entertainment, ect? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64205

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'm fine if area is taken from the Greenbelt for housing but for every acre taken two acres elsewhere should be protected. I'd also prefer see more push from your government for family sized condos/apartments in the city to lessen the sprawl in the GTA.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64206

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is ridiculous. After the huge public outcry in 2018, Ford walked back his plans to develop the Greenbelt, saying that he was "listening to the people". But now, just a few short years later, he's storming ahead with his original plan, once again citing housing needs as a flimsy excuse. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64207

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Page 10 of MMAH's Report of the Ontario Housing Affordability Task Force states: "But a shortage of land isn’t the cause of the problem. Land is available, both inside the existing built-up areas and on undeveloped land outside greenbelts." Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64208

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed amendments to the greenbelt plan, a plan designed to preserve ontarios natural beauty and ecosystems, is another example of the Ford government continuing to break promises if it means they can profit. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64209

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is ecologically destructive and will contribute to our climate crisis. The Greenbelt is there to protect and filter our water and air and damage to it cannot be undone - turning it into another paved car-centric region will have terrible environmental consequences. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64210

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Doug Ford got in promising not to mess with the greenbelt. It was designed to protect watersheds, farmland, and wildlife . Once it is gone we can never get it back. The substitutions proposed are laughable, many of them are already protected. Housing is needed in cities, not in the greenbelt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64211

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This project is a bad idea. The reduction of this greenspace will be bad for the environment, and the additional homes --- without adequate mass transit infrastructure --- will negatively impact the livability of the surrounding region. Lire davantage