Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

67838

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am writing to express my opposition to Bill 23 and associated policy proposals that would weaken environmental protections and undermine public involvement in land use planning and decision-making. I am particularly concerned about the: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

67841

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
How are we going to develop on land that feeds us, we need these greenbelts to produce food and products we so desperately need daily. There is always another option, we have to do better as a society in making better decisions, quick decisions lead to Bae consequences. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

67842

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
When I was in public school, I was taught that the greenbelt was a very important part of Ontario. That there is an aquifer underneath, containing a lot of freshwater that we use to drink. Another thing that I was told, was that new development would stop after existing plans were completed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

67844

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Explore higher density housing in already developed areas, rather than developing the green belt. Just because something is easier and provides a quick influx of cash for the Ontario government does not mean it is the right thing to do. At all.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

67849

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
No. Please do not destroy the green belt. We do not need more houses in this area. Life was much better and easy 20 years ago, when Canada’s population was 32M and people could afford food. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

67852

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Do not touch the Canada green belt, it needs to be protected. We don't need mansions or businesses out there, we need to support the small business in town and find a way to give los income households a decent place to live. Part of Canada's appeal is the nature around us.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

67854

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am a 24-year-old university student from Mississauga who is currently studying in the UK. As a young person, I am deeply concerned about proposals to downsize the Greenbelt. The reality is that young people have an outsized stake in the future of our province. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

67855

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The province needs to focus on densification and enabling development of adorable housing projects. Sprawl and commuter suburbs is not sustainable for a fast growing urban region like Toronto. Additionally it is critical to preserve as much green space as we can. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

67856

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
While I appreciate the need for more housing in the Hamilton-Guelph-Cambridge areas, it is not worth the environmental impact on these areas that removing these Greenbelt protection designations will incur. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

67857

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I don’t believe that destroying protected land is the only way to solve the housing crisis. There’s enough available land already but it needs smarter planning to build homes. But more importantly it should never be so simple to choose to destroy out ecosystem. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

67858

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This move to develop the greenbelt is uneeded, greedy, but most certainly short sighted. Not only did Mr. Ford promise not to develop the greenbelt, it has come out that he is doing so to benefit wealthy donors. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

67859

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Dear Premier You mentioned back in 2018 that you would not touch the green belt and here you are changing your mind. Your reason for destroying the green belt is to provide homes for the 300,000 immigrants, but there’s a better solution: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

67860

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We need our farmland. With food insecurity on the rise it is more important now than ever we are able to produce things ourselves. Wars are affecting our grain imports. Droughts have doubled the price of lettuce. Lire davantage