Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69678

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The majority of the province does not want the government to touch the greenbelt. The housing crisis can be solved using sites within urban centres as well as regulations to lower the number of empty houses (used for short term rentals). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69681

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As it currently stands, Bill 23 will decimate environmental protection for wetlands, woodlands and other sensitive green spaces, and it will prohibit conservation authorities from protecting these spaces. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69682

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I do appreciate that we need more housing in order to resolve the housing affordability problem. However, this is not the right way to do it. Suburban ground-oriented housing is inefficient to service and maintain, and encourages car-oriented transportation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69684

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
What this province needs is human-centric city planning. We need low-rose multi-family housing in walkable neighborhoods. We DO NOT need to expand outward. We DO NOT need to destroy the Green Belt. We're close enough to climate disaster as it is. Don't cross this line. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69692

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please protect our green belt. I fear once even a little bit is allowed to be developed on, the precedent will be set that it is OK. The green belt deserves to be protected for future generations to enjoy. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69697

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I disagree with the amendment. The purpose of the greenbelt is to protect this land forever, not shuffle the protection around to suit developers. Climate change is already having major effects on our country and moving the greenbelt is a dangerous idea.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69699

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The GTHA has plenty of room to grow and more importantly densify within and around the greenbelt. Adding more sprawl in the greenbelt will just amplify the problem with mobility for all other GTHA residents as more cars well be added to the network. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69703

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Of course this is about Doug Ford's friends benefiting. Weeks after buying protected land it somehow becomes unprotected and the price skyrockets? This is corruption and he should be sued and removed from office. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69710

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I absolutely oppose any development on existing Green Belt land. The Green Belt was designed to protect future generations of Ontarian's and this amendment runs against that goal. There is absolutely no reason to release lands from the Green Belt. Lire davantage