Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76010

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Selling Greenbelt land to developers is a blatant betrayal of public trust. The Ford government promised to protect these lands. Moreover this proposal will cost Toronto and other municipalities hundreds of millions of dollars in infrastructure costs that should be paid by developers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76012

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I grew up near the Greenbelt and am strongly opposed to this protected space being used for anything other than the beautiful outdoor activities it currently provides for Ontario citizens. We need denser, walkable cities - not more suburbs and highways.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76014

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Stop the division of the Greenbelt. It is unnecessary because other lands are available on which to build homes. The province should increase building density within existing cities and towns where the infrastructure is readily available now. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76015

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
No to this whole nefarious scheme! Removing even a part will fragment the Greenbelt and mess up the water system. Adding some somewhere else will only confuse that environment and and make a mess of smother community. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76016

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
There should be a Public Inquiry into how this came about. This smells like a back room deal with the Developers. The OPP should investigate. Purchasing land just weeks before the designation changes? Coincidence? I think not. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76017

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The plan mentions building housing and related infrastructure . Does that include schools, stores, community facilities, transit, and parks? It sounds like it is all about single family homes once again. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76019

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am disgusted, disappointed and angry that the Ford Government has decided to build on the greenbelt. This development will NOT help with the housing crisis as they will be monster homes, sold for millions and away from jobs, transportation and amenities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76022

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Do not touch our Greenbelt. I will not say please as that is totally unnecessary. You campaigned on the promise of never touching the environmentally necessary greenbelt. Now you want to build a ghetto there. Please don't try the con that this is for low cost housing. No one believes this. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76025

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I vehemently oppose the opening up of the proposed Greenbelt lands. Keep to your promise- the public does NOT want this, only the developers who are set to benefit and will not be held to any account to actually make the housing on these lands ‘affordable’. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76028

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This proposal is absolutely absurd. I am against any changes to our Greenbelt protection. Keep the Greenbelt protected! I do not approve building on our important Greenbelt land. Find other ways to create housing. Doug Ford has got to go! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76029

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
With all due respect, this idea is solely rooted in the desire to enrich developers, and there is little to no scientific, or expert rationale for this move. I implore you to please put the environment first. This can't be undone. Do not proceed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76030

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I stand against Bill 23 as a young architect in Ontario committed to solving the housing and climate crisis in an equitable and appropriate manner. Solutions void of corruption is also welcomed. I have pasted the Open Letter written by leading architects of Ontario down below. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76031

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The studies have been done - the Greenbelt doesn't NEED this expansion to accommodate new housing. This policy, like all of this conservative government's policies, only serves to benefit Premier Gourd and a select group of his political misfits. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76034

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please. Growth and housing need to grow smart and thoughtfully if we are too have thriving communities that meet the needs. This feels like an opening for rash, crowded and poorly regulated housing and development. It does not quarantee affordable housing. We can do better! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76040

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
What is the point in building on land WHICH was PROMISED to be PROTECTED by the premier countless of times. Moreover there is so much land in cities that hasn't been used that could be actual "affordable houses". Lire davantage