Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64691

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
It is unacceptable to destroy protected natural space in the name of supposed progress. What we need is significant infill in cities, well-built, meaningful, and affordable developments, that are sustainable, rather than infinite sprawl. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64692

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I would like to emphasize that i am extremely disappointed with this proposal The Ford Government had stated unequivocally that they will not harm the green belt. Minister Clark is on record stating "We’re not going to entertain any conversations about a land swap on the Greenbelt". Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64698

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As I understand it, a recent commission to look at the feasibility of expanding the Greenbelt found that it would be more worthwhile to increase density than it would be to begin developing the Greenbelt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64700

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a resident of Ontario for over 30 years, I strongly oppose the development of the Greenbelt. The GTA and surrounding areas need greenspace to be kept green. Please do not allow for ANY development on these lands. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64702

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I strongly oppose this proposal. Building low-density housing far away from jobs will only create downstream problems for the province. We need housing near where jobs are. We need housing that won't put more cars on the road. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64704

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I believe the lands which currently comprise the green belt should remain as such. Communities surrounding the green belt have opportunities for in-fill and intensification within their existing lands. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64705

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
When the entire world has already been in high alert due to climate change, taking our Green Belt protected areas is so counterintuitive! Once it’s gone, it’s gone. It’s not worth it to put a few more millions in Doug’s friends’ pockets. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64708

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The green belt is one of our most important environmental resources. This should not and cannot go forward. This government is robbing Ontariens of their right to water and biodiversity in the name of developer greed. Shame on you. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64715

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am very much opposed to the development of housing and destruction of the Greenbelt. This will have devastating and long-term consequences on the wildlife and nature within and around that area that is vital to sustaining the ecosystem. Lire davantage