Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77284

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Humphries Planning Group Inc. (HPGI) represents 100032319 Ontario Inc., the registered owner of the property located at 11840 Keele Street in the City of Vaughan (the “Subject Property”). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77294

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We are staring down the barrel of a climate crisis that will not only damage infrastructure but also future generations. I feel building on the Greenbelt would be a huge misstep that does not put Ontarians first in the slightest. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77297

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The housing commission has found there is sufficient land available within curent urban boundaries. Stay in your lane and focus on fixing this province and stay out of the development business 9

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77298

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to bill 23. The annexation and development of the greenbelt should not be attempted. Doug Ford made it clear that it would not be touched.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77300

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Why are we touching the Greenbelt? The Housing Commission has found that we do not need to expand our urban boundaries to create the 1.5 million homes that we are told we need. This appears to be benefiting developers at the expense of our wetlands and protected areas. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77312

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not think that any land in the greenbelt should be developed. The conservation authority has advised against it. Many experts do not think it is a good idea. That the area will be more likely to flood, as others have done in the gta. The farmland in the area is something we should not lose. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77314

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The green belt needs to be kept an environmental zone, so future generations have a fighting chance. STOP PRIORITIZING PROFITS OVER PEOPLE.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77316

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am horrified that premier Ford who had promised not to touch the greenbelt has now decided it can be developed. It is extremely concerning that a few developers have purchased greenbelt land in the past few years, which is now being removed from the greenbelt for development. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77323

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Doug ford Gov't needs to immediately stop with this idea that they have a mandate or even are able to change the status of protected land in the greenbelt and use it for housing, or anything else outside the scope of the previous agreement, and recent promise not to. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77326

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am completely opposed to Bill 23 and it’s proposed changes to the existing greenbelt . Doug Ford promised not to touch the greenbelt

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77332

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Lands should not be removed from the Greenbelt. It was thoughtfully designed as part of a planning process. It protects important Agricultural lands and watersheds. This is critical to environmental stability and food security. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77337

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

No to removing any land from the greenbelt when we are facing a climate emergency. There are other places to put affordable housing. This government's promises to replace it are obviously empty and do not impact my perspective. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77343

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal is completely irresponsible at all levels of government. The environment protections should not be sacrificed for housing, commercial, retail development. This is our responsibility to protect. Canada is big enough - build somewhere else. There should be a referendum on this. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77344

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Premier lied when he promised he wouldn't touch the greenbelt. There is more than enough land to build homes without touching the greenbelt

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77346

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This government presents as being oblivious to science, social issues and how to sustain life for human kind. I don't believe reading is part of any preparation for decision making. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77347

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am heartbroken and disheartened by this proposed bill and the destruction of a significant portion of the Greenbelt. There is adequate land zoned for housing to build the proposed units without impacting the Greenbelt land. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77348

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed changes to the Greenbelt must not go ahead. The Greenbelt was protected for the good of all Ontarians, and removing those protections to build homes only the wealthiest can afford stands in direct opposition to that public good. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77350

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We have farms in the greenbelt and some not. A lot of the farms excluded when the greenbelt was first laid out(2005?), Came down to who the owners were.Our opinion is with how much good farmland is being paved over this government will never get my support again! Lire davantage