Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94143

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is completely unnecessary and just as disingenuous and ill-gotten an idea as removing lands from the Greenbelt and redrawing municipal boundaries to further chip away at protected areas and our waters for the sake of private business profit. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94147

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am against this proposal. The environment should be protected and there should be no shortcuts to obtaining this permit. The long term success of Ontario and Canada depend on it.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94148

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Hi, I very much disagree with the proposed changes. You start by saying that "Good management of stormwater is an important part of ensuring Ontario has clean water for drinking, manufacturing products and recreational activities now and into the future." Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94150

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I oppose removing approvals, or allowing self registration and reporting for any environmental issue. It has been made clear for decades that when the power of self-regulation has been given to companies and potential polluters, the environment has suffered. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94151

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I strongly support streamlining and removing regulations so that more housing is built more quickly

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94152

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Developers should have to pay extra to ensure proper infrastructure is in place to handle storm water. The Cost should then be passed down to the purchaser. If the purchaser is not an individual, the fee should triple

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94153

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Absolutely not. This PC gov has lost all public trust with how they have been operating I regards to developers. From Greenbelt, MZO, Ontario place to only name a few, allowing developers to bypass permit review is the most ridiculous thing ever

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94155

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I have zero faith that anything that this government does, let alone removing oversight from corporate interests, is for the benefit of the typical ontarian. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94157

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Permits and approvals keep us and our environment safe. No oversight will ensure our safety and environmental health is compromised. Short term gain to the long term detriment of our people and ecosystems.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94158

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Getting rid of environmental restrictions because the developers that donate to you ask for it is generally a bad idea.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94160

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We need STRONGER protections to prevent future spills and not weaker! I am against this proposal because it does not protect the environment at ALL.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94161

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Short sighted proposal in the name of 'expediting housing' which will lead to long term damage of environment and water supply. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94169

Commentaire fait au nom

Halton Region

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Halton Region's comments on the following Proposals: Streamlining permissions for water takings for construction site dewatering activities and foundation drains Streamlining Permissions for Stormwater Management Permit-By-Rule Framework Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94171

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
this proposal as it would bypass their engineering/ surface- and groundwater review process and essentially undo the last 40 years of improvements to environmental protection

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94174

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Public consultation should always be available in application processes. Conservation authorities must be involved in planning and oversight on stormwater management on any site. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94176

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Absolutely not. Who benefits from this proposal? Definitely NOT the people, environment, and water shed system. There are approval requirements for a REASON for the safety of our local residents and environment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94181

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am strongly opposed to this. This is placing way too much trust in developers, who time after time have demonstrated their greed and their prioritization of profits over safety. This hides behind the guise of supporting housing needs in a time of crisis but this is a massive safety oversight.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94183

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This cannot be allowed. The environmental disaster caused by the Brenntag fire should be evidence enough that this is not a place to be cutting 'red tape'. More accountability and environmental oversight is needed, not the opposite.