Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

97991

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Angular plane requirements are incredibly restrictive on garden suites and reduce the number of compatible lots to a fraction of what would be otherwise allowed with an equivalent laneway lot. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98027

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please stop “cutting red tape” and using MZOs to make it easier for developers to destroy wildlife habitat, wetlands, forests, etc. The UN says that affordable housing must not come at a coat to the environment. And these projects are mostly commercial and industrial. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98054

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Concerning permissions for three residential units per lot, please ensure that the regulatory changes limit municipalities to permit the required parking be "no more than one space per unit". Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98132

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Question 1. Are there specific zoning by-law barriers standards or requirements that frustrate the development of ARUs (e.g., maximum building height, minimum lot size, side and rear lot setbacks, lot coverage, maximum number of bedrooms permitted per lot, and angular plane requirements, etc.)? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98254

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a step in the right direction to alleviating housing shortage in Ontario. However, I would recommend that a closer attention is paid to development on shorelines in Settlement Areas. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98390

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

April 27, 2024 re:- comment re Bill 185 Hello, I would like to propose some modifications to Bill 185 to make it more effective based on my own personal experience with increasing the supply of housing and municipal resistance and obstruction to same. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98396

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not believe that limits on lot coverage or limits on the number of bedrooms are a barrier to the creation of Additional Residential Units.  The largest barrier will be the building costs of creating the units including hooking up to municipal services such as sewer and water.  The limits on bed Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98404

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

April 28, 2024 re:- additional comments re Bill 185 / ERO # 019-8366 Hello, these are some new comments additional to my comments of April 27/24, ie comment id 98390:- (11) The Planning Act needs a clause to explicitly forbid municipalities Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98550

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The province should consider introducing a standard definition for the minimum number of dwelling units that constitutes an apartment building. In Toronto, an apartment building is defined as having 5 or more units, in other cities it is more than 3 units. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98601

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

To Whom It May Concern, The consideration for Additional Residential Units (ARU)s is not a plausible solution to building more homes. Please accept these comments - not from a NIMBY perspective - but to be practical and realistic. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98617

Commentaire fait au nom

Bruce County

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for providing the opportunity for the County of Bruce to comment on ERO Posting 019-8366 which seeks input on reducing barriers to additional residential units through the Environmental Registry. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98649

Commentaire fait au nom

Climate Action Newmarket Aurora

Statut du commentaire

Climate Action Newmarket-Aurora input for BIll 185 Cutting Red Tape ERO 019-8365 The Greenbelt and our agricultural lands are threatened even more so now with Bill 185 and the proposed Provincial Planning Statement than the 2021-23 Greenbelt controversy. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98770

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

While I recognize the need for more rental housing, I do not support the creation of a free-for-all approach to development of rental units in residential areas which is NOT compatible with residential properties that surround the proposed development and that would have a negative effect on the str Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98771

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I like the local bylaws they way they are. Our home is our single biggest investment. We are counting on it as neither my wife nor I work for the government or have juicy union pensions like some enjoy. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98772

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The housing crisis is not due to zoning barriers, it is due to high immigration. Leave things alone and instead negotiate a new immigration agreement with the federal government that caps immigration, as Quebec has. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98786

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

While I agree there is a housing crisis, there are many homes left empty in our area and the main issue is affordability. Building more houses is not really going to help with the affordability issues! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98791

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not believe that limits on lot coverage or limits on the number of bedrooms are a barrier to the creation of Additional Residential Units. The largest barrier will be the building costs of creating the units including hooking up to municipal services such as sewer and water. Lire davantage