Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98925

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Mississauga

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Environmental Registry of Ontario (“ERO”) posting 019-8369 and Ontario’s Regulatory Registry (“ORR”) posting 24-MMAH010 regarding the proposed Planning Act, City of Toronto Act, 2006, and Municipal Act, 2001 Changes (Schedules 4, 9, and 12 o Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98926

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I feel that the Region of Waterloo should retain planning authority for the Region. Removal of this could threaten most of the environmental protections in this area such as the Countryside Line and Environmentally Sensitive Landscapes. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98928

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I feel that the Region of Waterloo should retain planning authority for the Region. Removal of this could threaten most of the environmental protections in this area such as the Countryside Line and Environmentally Sensitive Landscapes. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98935

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a citizen of Ontario who is deeply concerned about the appropriate and sustainable management of the lands within Ontario, I am deeply opposed to the proposal to remove the public’s appeal rights for the adoption or amendment of Official Plans and Zoning By-Laws. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98944

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose the revocation of the public's appeal rights to the Tribunal. Bill 185, Schedule 12, WRONGLY seeks to remove the public's ability to appeal the adoption or amendment of Official Plans and Zoning By-Laws to the Tribunal. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98954

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The public deserves to maintain our say in how our neighbourhoods develop and the quality of our local environments. You should not remove the long-standing right of the public to appeal the adoption or amendment of Official Plans and Zoning By-Laws to the Ontario Land Tribunal.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98957

Commentaire fait au nom

Watson & Associates Economists Ltd.

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of our many municipal clients, we are submitting our comments related to the proposed changes to the Municipal Act and Planning Act as proposed by Bill 185 (Cutting Red Tape to Build More Homes Act). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98960

Commentaire fait au nom

Ramara Township

Statut du commentaire

Dear Minister Calandra, The Township of Ramara has reviewed the proposed Bill 185 Cutting Red Tape to Build More Homes Act, 2024) and the Updated Draft Provincial Planning Statement. The Township is submitting the following comments for consideration: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98966

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 185 - SCHEDULE 12 - PLANNING ACT Comments: * Stripping upper-tier municipalities of planning responsibilities will (in case of Niagara) leave 12 lower-tier municipalities without input of environmental experts who exist solely at the upper Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98980

Commentaire fait au nom

The Corporation of the Township of North Dumfries

Statut du commentaire

The Council of The Corporation of the Township of North Dumfries at their April 22nd, 2024 Meeting adopted a Resolution in response to Bill 185. The attached Staff Report and Council Resolution are submitted to the Government for their review and consideration Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98990

Commentaire fait au nom

Primont

Statut du commentaire

Primont has developed this response to the province’s ERO 019-8369 posting, titled, “Proposed Planning Act, City of Toronto Act, 2006, and Municipal Act, 2001 Changes (Schedules 4, 9, and 12 of Bill 185 – the proposed Bill 185, Cutting Red Tape to Build More Homes Act, 2024”. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99009

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

- It is good to see the absurd Community Infrastructure and Housing Accelerator (CHIA) introduced by Bill 109 rescinded. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99012

Commentaire fait au nom

Ottawa-Carleton District School Board

Statut du commentaire

The Ottawa-Carleton District School Board (OCDSB) can provide the following comments in response to the proposed amendments to the Planning Act through Bill 185 Cutting Red Tape to Build More Homes Act, 2024: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99015

Commentaire fait au nom

Architectural Conservancy Ontario

Statut du commentaire

Architectural Conservancy Ontario (ACO), Ontario's lead non-governmental organization on built heritage and cultural heritage places, is very concerned about four changes proposed in Bill 185. 1) Limit third party appeals Lire davantage