Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150438

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a resident and taxpayer of The Township of West Grey, I strongly oppose allowing Walker aggregates permission to remove a maximum of 2,890,800,000 litres of water, per year, for a maximum of 10 years, from the aquifer at lot 19, concession 5 NDR. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150441

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We as a property owner are not allowed to do anything water related, take from, reconstruct….. I absolutely disagree that a gravel pit should be allowed to take from the saugeen! If they cannot dig a well like a home owner is required to do then they should not draw from that source!!! Period!!!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150442

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am writing in objection to the issuance of a water permit for Walker Aggregates. We rely on our fresh water and we need to preserve it. Walker aggregates should not be permitted to take millions of liters of water 24 hours a day. Please consider the negative impact over time. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150444

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This request appears to be a blanket 24/7 maximum usage of water from the Saugeen River Watershed. It's an extension of an existing license with no requirement of up-to-date environmental awareness. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150445

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a landowner within 300 metres of the Saugeen River, we oppose this application. We expect the government at all levels work to protect the environment and wildlife surrounding the two waterways affected by this application. Priceville, Ontario Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150446

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I do not support Walker’s proposal to take water 24/7 from the local rivers, nor should anyone else who cares about the environment and habitat of many. Nothing is more important than water. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150447

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is unacceptable! This is a massive amount of water. With the lady pot that went in (now closed) we saw our water table and well affected. We live about a mile and a half from where that pit was. This is a much larger volume, and will surely adversely impact a much wider area.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150449

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I urge the government to NOT grant this permit. The fact that it is a Category 3 permit which means that it will have unacceptable effects on the environment, means that granting the permit is unacceptable. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150450

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As residents and land owners within 300 metres of the Saugeen River we strongly oppose this application. We would expect the government and review the effect this would have on the environment, surrounding properties and wildlife. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150452

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The rivers are an important watershed for Lake Huron. It is also used extensively for recreation purposes. Allowing Walker to take water 24 hours a day 365 days a year can only impact the water flow and quality of our rivers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150454

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
What a sneaky, Slimy way of doing business. The consulting firm that came around 3 weeks after the permit was applied for.. acted as if he knew nothing of the proposal. What a disgrace. I have been in areas that have had water permits changed. They have resulted in wells drying up.. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150457

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We have built our dream home in a subdivision less than 1km away, and are very worried with this huge amount of proposed water consumption by Walker Pit that it will cause our available well water to decrease drastically. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150468

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I’m a resident of the area and own a property that is significant to the environment (wetlands).I can not support the taking of mass amounts of water from our local rivers and ponds especially being considers a Category 3 impact. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150469

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is absolutely unacceptable. The environmental damage these proposed extractions will cause is disastrous. Our wildlife and waters deserve protection. Please rethink this and listen to environmentalists and concerned citizens. It could cause irreparable damage. Lire davantage