Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170558

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
You can’t legislate away extinction. You can only remove the tools meant to slow it. This proposal removes those tools—and with them, the credibility of any future conservation promises Canada tries to make.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170559

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
There’s no such thing as a neutral environmental policy when the consequences are irreversible. These species either remain protected, or they begin the slow slide toward extinction. The government cannot afford to treat that decision lightly.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170561

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
These amendments are designed to look like administrative efficiency, but the real cost is life. It’s easier to cut paper than it is to restore ecosystems. Once protections are gone, they rarely come back in time to make a difference.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170562

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We teach our children to respect nature, yet this government proposes legislation that bulldozes that principle. Conservation without integrity is propaganda. If you remove science from the process, you’re not saving nature—you’re selling it.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170563

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Don’t be stupid, there is nothing justifying this except for your greed for money. No one wants this and you’re doing so much more harm than good.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170564

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
What message does it send to allow a government to erase protections with a signature? That life is negotiable? That extinction is acceptable if it's profitable? This isn't policy—it's abandonment, and it must be stopped before the damage is permanent.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170565

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Every species removed is a future memory of what we failed to protect. These amendments don’t just undermine policy—they erase future possibilities. We need to protect what’s left, not hand out permission slips for destruction.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170566

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This legislation pretends to streamline protection, but in reality, it opens the floodgates to development at the cost of life. You cannot streamline extinction. The amendment should be scrapped entirely before irreversible harm is written into law.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170567

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Conservation science exists for a reason—to remove emotion, politics, and profit from decisions about survival. Handing species status to government control reverses decades of hard-won progress and leaves wildlife at the mercy of shifting agendas.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170568

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We are in the midst of a biodiversity crisis. Slashing protections now is like throwing away a life raft during a flood. These species are indicators of ecosystem health. If they go, we all follow. This amendment is ecological suicide.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170569

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Removing 106 species from the endangered list is not a clerical update. It’s a mass deregulation event with catastrophic ecological consequences. There is no way to justify this beyond the prioritization of corporate gain over planetary survival.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170570

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This proposal is an insult to the scientists, activists, and Indigenous land defenders who have spent years fighting to protect these species. It dismisses their work, their warnings, and the truth of what’s happening on the ground.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170571

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Letting the government rewrite the endangered species list is like letting a fire marshal redefine what counts as a fire—while the building is still burning. These decisions belong in the hands of those with no stake in the outcome.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170572

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Protecting species is not a partisan issue. These amendments are a quiet attack on accountability, wrapped in legal language. Wildlife does not get second chances. We must act as if each life matters—because it does.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170573

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This legislation is the legal equivalent of a bulldozer. Once it's passed, habitat will be cleared, protections will be erased, and industry will claim victory. The cost? Irreplaceable species. The loss? Ours to carry forever.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170574

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Every species you eradicate upsets the balance of nature. Without protecting our wildlife and their habitats you are condemning future generations to the consequences of destroying nature. Our future is bleak with the damage your government is doing to our environment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170575

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
No democratic society should allow the same body that profits from development to decide which lives are worth saving. These amendments collapse the wall between governance and greed. They are a threat to every endangered species in this country.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170576

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The 106 species facing delisting are only the beginning. If this proposal passes, it sets a precedent for future cuts, future rollbacks, future extinctions. This isn’t just about now—it’s about everything we’ll lose next.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170577

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Endangered species status should be a shield, not a target. This amendment turns protection into vulnerability by giving governments the power to erase it when it becomes inconvenient. That’s not conservation—it’s betrayal

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170578

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
These species are disappearing because of us—habitat destruction, pollution, climate change, and relentless expansion. To then remove their protections is like striking the final blow and pretending it’s mercy. The public sees through this.