Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

62552

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Sprawl is unsustainable. The greenbelt is a common resource for all. Our drinking water and natural environment are not to be handed as political rewards. No trading of lands, no reduction in the greenbelt and no expansion of municipal boundaries. Read more

Comment ID

62553

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Replacing the Green Belt with lands that are already protected through other policies is not in fact replacing the Green Belt. It is removing protected green space by simply reframing how pieces of land are classified/regulated through policy and ending up with less land protected. Read more

Comment ID

62554

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This proposal makes me so viciously angry. There is a reason this is a greenbelt. It is not for nothing. If you allow Ford to go back on the Greenbelt plan then where does it stop? What prevents him from building more and more until the Greenbelt is none existant? Read more

Comment ID

62558

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Removing greenbelt protections will cost the province millions of dollars. These proposed areas provide natural protection from flooding and stormwater. And they do it for free. Removal of these protections puts nearby homes and businesses at risk of serious damage due to flooding. Read more

Comment ID

62559

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Cities in Ontario are mostly comprised of single family houses, even in Toronto. We need to densify cities, allowing gentle densification in all residential neighbourhoods is the best way forward. Why would you support sprawling and a development model that has proved to be non-sustainable? Read more

Comment ID

62560

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is an extreme betrayal of public trust. The greenbelt is a provincial and national Park. To erode it and destroy it is absolutely unacceptable. We need to seek intensification for many reasons mainly it reduces the tax burden on taxpayers. Read more

Comment ID

62562

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Doug Ford and his Cronies set out to make life even more awful, hopeless and futureless for millions of Ontarians. He would rather trample on our livelihood for a quick buck than think of an actually creative solution to housing. If he really cared about Ontarians and their housing he would Read more

Comment ID

62568

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am opposed to any removal of greenbelt lands to expand development, even with proposed additions. This is a misleading proposal, as the additional lands were already committed to prior to the proposed removals, and is being misrepresented as a fair trade. Read more

Comment ID

62570

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do not support any destruction of the green belt. I find it repulsive that the Ford government is considering destroying this land for housing development- the housing crisis did not happen overnight and destroying protected land is not the answer that will resolve this issue. Read more

Comment ID

62572

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Opening any part of the greenbelt for development will increase sprawl (since it will be development by definition outside the city limits). It will increase greenhouse gas emissions because people will need to travel for work, shopping, etc. Read more

Comment ID

62574

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Greenbelt exists for a reason. It's not just a matter of "oh, it's nice to have some green space." It's protecting homes from flooding and ecosystems from collapsing. As climate catastrophe intensifies, protection of the Greenbelt becomes even more vital. Read more