Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

93508

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Ontario Auditor General has pointed out that the ministry took over seven weeks to post a decision notice to inform the public that it had filed a regulation related to approval requirements. Read more

Comment ID

93549

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I, as an individual, agree with the Canadian Environmental Law Association in the following points. *There will not be an up-front, detailed review by Ministry staff to assess the potential environmental impacts of the specified operations Read more

Comment ID

93557

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am providing a single set of comments in response to the policy and regulation proposals in the following postings on the Environmental Registry of Ontario: ERO #019-6951, ERO #019-6853, ERO #019-6963, and ERO #019-6928 ("ERO Proposals"), as these proposals are intended to implement a single packa Read more

Comment ID

93564

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am a very very concerned citizen who adamantly opposes the streamlining of the permit process. Fast tracking a process, which should take into account a great number of factors before making a decision is risky and careless. Read more

Comment ID

93568

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am very much opposed to this proposed change. I cannot fathom why you would even be considering it. Everything to do with the Health of our province deserves More scrutiny-not less. Please do the RIGHT thing. Read more

Comment ID

93599

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing to express my significant concerns regarding the proposed changes by the Ontario government to streamline permissions for temporary water taking activities, particularly the removal of the volumetric water taking limit for dewatered work areas within construction sites and the eliminati Read more

Comment ID

93603

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The current regime requires application and approval for the taking of more than 50,000 litres of water per day and this proposal to remove of the limit for groundwater-taking and to allow up to 379,000 litres of groundwater taken per day without permit is pure folly when water is considered to be o Read more

Comment ID

93621

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I insist that an arms length study MUST be done to fully understand the impact of water taking on each individual site. I demand that public consultation and input MUST continue to be part of the granting of water taking permits. Read more

Comment ID

93627

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I feel very strongly that study MUST be done to fully understand the impact of water taking on each individual site of any project in Ontario which could affect water usage, with or without ground water- taking permits. Read more

Comment ID

93644

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
In the October 3rd Webinar Streamlining Permissions for Water Taking and Stormwater Management, we were told: 1.] Developers are finding the storm bylaw limits more stringent than they need to be. 2.] Each municipality should be setting limits based on their background levels. Response: Read more

Comment ID

93650

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There are major concerns in regard to this proposal as it relates to our community in Porcupine, Ontario. There has been 50 years of sewage bypasses going into our small lake and no one paid attention until concerned residents became vocal due to sewage and toilet paper along their docks, etc. Read more

Comment ID

93667

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am diametrically opposed to this idea. Why on earth would anyone think giving people carte blanche to do whatever they want with our precious water resources without any oversight, is a good idea? Read more