Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

92032

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am very concerned about the “minor projects”, “management” of “hyerabundant” wildlife, “management” of beaver dams, control of pathogens, and “mitigating human wildlife conflicts” mentioned in the ERO. This “management” usually involves trapping and shooting wildlife. Read more

Comment ID

92034

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am very concerned about the “minor project” exemptions regarding wildlife. “Management” of “hyperabundant” wildlife usually means shooting and/or lethal trapping of animals like cormorants, deer, raccoons, etc. Read more

Comment ID

92144

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please only use non lethal beaver management. https://thefurbearers.com/downloads/PDFs/Beaver%20Book%20-%202019-10-08%20The%20Fur-Bearers.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1wp4qVXhAiDt3OzeAmlNe5bo35m0opAuPKZ9oLgWYmVk6JNcohAMtlrpI Read more

Comment ID

92212

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am not in favour of of this change. The Ford government has shown that all they care about is destroying the greenbelt, wetlands and and conservation areas in order to line the pockets of the rich builders. There is enough unused space in the existing cities.

Comment ID

92214

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
People in Ontario know what all these changes are for. Your government has shown their true colours. Destroy, destroy, destroy and build, build, build. We are not stupid. This is not more protection it is removing protections and we all know it. Ford and all his government should be ashamed.

Comment ID

92234

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Unlike the Planning Act, or the Environmental Assessment Act, the Public Lands Act or a number of other pieces of legislation, there is no section in the PPCRA that says the minister can issue policies (associated procedures implied) under the act. Read more

Comment ID

92667

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I thinknwe should be expanding the protection of our parks, not reducing them. From what I can tell the proposal removes the requirement for an environmental assessment for projects like campgrounds and parking lots? Read more

Comment ID

92678

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This appears to be another example of eliminating detail and consideration of environmental and biodiversity conservation in order to pave way for human focused development and projects within parks. The framing of this is as suspect as reading the toronto sun or the national post. Read more

Comment ID

92681

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Development cannot come at the expense of our environment. This policy gives too much power to the minister to approve projects without requiring them to undergo a review. This cannot be allowed. I do not support this policy.

Comment ID

92713

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Based on the Greenbelt sell off to Doug Ford's developer cronies, we know what "reducing delays" means. It means doing what Doug Ford and his government want which will quite likely be to the detriment of the people of Ontario. I absolutely do not support this legislation.