Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

11551

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would like to appeal to the Ministry to create a water management process that considers groundwater as part of freshwater systems connected to rivers, lakes and wetlands, all with intricate ecological purposes, and not simply as a quantity of water supply for human needs. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

11553

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I support the extension of the moratorium. In Centre Wellington we do not have enough water to support the projected growth. We should not have to compete for water with a private company. The public’s need for water comes first.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

11558

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Policy must prioritize water uses, putting the needs of ecosystems, agriculture, growing municipalities and strong local economies above commercial water bottling – an industry that is not only fundamentally harmful to the environment but is for the most part unrequired. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

11559

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hi. I’m a first year university student I believe that the only time the using bottle water is the best option for us is in the case of a water crisis where some form of biological or chemical contaminant is in the public water system or a public water system is not accessible. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

11560

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I completed the survey, but want to add that I think the moratorium should be extended well beyond a year. Ground water does not always renew at the rate which it is extracted. It is not a completely renewable resource depending on the speed we use it. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

11561

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Water is essential to life. At the same time, fresh drinking water (groundwater being a prime source), is scarce. Conflicts have arisen because of this. The recent California drought is one example, but there are many. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

11562

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Mining water for bottling purposes by private firms compromises public water supplies. Commercial water-taking of the type Nestle intends compromises community growth. Commercial water-bottling are not generators of large numbers of jobs. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

11568

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We need to protect and preserve our groundwater supply for future generations. Allowing Nestlé to drain aquifers on First Nations land is shortsighted and profit driven but will cost us dearly in the future. Please stop the draining of our aquifers.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

11571

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I support the extension of this moratorium. It is foolish to squander our precious freshwater resources in the name of (minor) short term profit. Granting permits to bottled water companies directly contradicts the precautionary principle. Lire davantage