Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16651

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I find it quite concerning that the Ministry of the Environment would be proposing the removal / reduction of controls on industries which are releasing toxins into the environment which will result in increased environmental damage. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16897

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have real concerns with rolling back reporting on toxic substances. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16921

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Regulations of toxins is not red tape. It is accountability and protection of our health. To reduce any safety measures re toxins is foolhardy. I am old enough to remember Walkerton. You have done away with the environment commissioner. The chief scientist also. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17405

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I oppose the suggested exemption of certain facilities from all future planning and reporting obligations for certain substances. \every single day there are more rare diseases diagnosed in new borns and children from the slew of chemicals we are exposed to in our lives. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17406

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I oppose the suggested exemption of certain facilities from all future planning and reporting obligations for certain substances. Every single day there are more rare diseases diagnosed in new borns and children from the slew of chemicals we are exposed in our lives. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17416

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Reducing regularity burden when it comes to toxic substances doesn't sound like a great plan. Many of my fellow Conservatives are concerned that this bill is going too far!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17427

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

PLEASE DO NOT REPEAL THIS LEGISLATION. NO RATIONAL IS PROVIDED EXPLAINING HOW THE ENVIRONMENT WILL BE PROTECTED AFTER REPEAL. planning to reduce toxins sounds like a good idea. Lets continue to require plans and implementation.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17467

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

What is the hoped for outcome of not reviewing a plan to reduce toxins? We already know that large industries pay their way out of fines and continue to emit toxins leading to continued poor air quality, polluted waters and ultimately negative health impacts for humans and wildlife. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17527

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal is ridiculous and unacceptable. We want responsible companies that are accountable and transparent. The Toxic Reduction Act is important for our environment and our personal health and welfare.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17538

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose the plan to no longer require facilities with existing toxics reduction plans to review those plans, and exempt certain facilities from all future planning and reporting obligations. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17539

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support Bill 66. I do not support Schedule 5 and Schedule 10 under this Bill. It is undemocratic and lacks transparency. It would leave citizens without recourse. Community members would not be able to appeal open-for-business by-laws to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17545

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support Bill 66. I do not support Schedule 5 and Schedule 10 under this Bill. It is undemocratic and lacks transparency. It would leave citizens without recourse. Community members would not be able to appeal open-for-business by-laws to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17546

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The repeal of this legislation concerns me because it would threaten human and wildlife health through increased exposure to toxic chemicals. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17560

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Reject the repeal of the Toxic Reductions Act! To repeal this act threatens human and wildlife health through increased exposure to toxic chemicals. The Act, which requires certain industrial facilities to consider ways to reduce the use and emission of toxic chemicals in Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17567

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 is a step towards the destruction of wetlands, woodlands, habitats and species all across Ontario. It is a step toward the destruction of local drinking water management and in turn our public health. It is a step towards the destruction of farm lands and the continuation of urban sprawl. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17596

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I oppose an attempts to repeal the Toxics Reduction Act . We should be increasing our efforts to reduce industrial toxins. Lire davantage