Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50408

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This ‘pay to slay’ legislation wrongly incentivizes habitat destruction. Proponents of harmful activities will now have clearance as soon as they pay into the fund. This is absolutely the wrong direction for the province and will create further loss of species at risk. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50414

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is incredibly wrong, and is going to have detrimental impacts on species at risk. This gives an incentive for habitat destruction, thus resulting in a loss of habitat for species. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50416

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is one of the worst proposals. Species at risk need to be protected, this is why they are considered at risk. Allowing anyone to pay into a fund does nothing to protect the species. At this rate we will lose everything. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50417

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a certified arborist and BHA, I do not agree with canning the BHA certification course. It is a valuable resource and one would not be qualified to assess butternut canker without it. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50418

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The fund and agency proposed in the regulation are reasonable on their own, but what seems questionable is offering the choice between beneficial actions to protect species, and paying into the fund, because these are not equivalent actions when it comes to species protection. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50420

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am a citizen of Toronto, Ontario, and I am very concerned about the proposed species at risk conservation fund. Offsetting damages by paying into a fund does not protect biodiversity, nor does it reverse the harms done to the critical members of our ecosystems. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50421

Commentaire fait au nom

Quinte Field Naturalist Association

Statut du commentaire

We, are group consisting of 99 members, are strongly opposed to the Government’s proposal of new regulations to enable use of the Species at Risk Conservation Fund and to establish a provincial agency to administer the Fund. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50422

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The stated objectives of this proposal are • “to enable use of the Species at Risk Conservation Fund (the Fund) and to establish a provincial agency to administer the Fund” and Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50424

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

These changes will make it easier for developers to destroy species at risk, as it rolls back the authority of the SARA act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50425

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

How is allow people to pay to destroy habits going to help habitats? This allows for zero consequences to corporations and individuals who destroy a habit. As long as those who offend pay into the fund they get to walk away scot free. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50426

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Disagree with the concept. Just found out about this today. With changes to conservation authorities terms of reference this is another attack against nature. Sounds like we may have a one term ruling party here.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50431

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am extremely concerned about this government continually attack to weaken protections through changes to Ontario's Environmental Legislation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50436

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This government is so short sighted it is ridiculous. Attacking the measures that would help the environment, attacking wildlife, attacking the habitats of wildlife, and for what? The almighty dollar. It makes me sick that these people are ruining the Ontario I know. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50437

Commentaire fait au nom

Wilderness Committee--Ontario

Statut du commentaire

December 19 ,2020 Environmental Registry of Ontario ESAReg@ontario.ca RE: Comments on ERO 019-2636 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50438

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is disgusting. We need to be protecting our planet and province and instead Ford is trying to destroy it. We cannot let this happen

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

50440

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

ERO 019-2636 Let’s call this what it truly IS: The slush-fund for ill-gotten gains of a grotesquely inhumane pay-to-slay scheme —enabling developers to fast-track projects that should never be allowed. Lire davantage