Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72529

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This Act has the potential to erase valuable heritage landmarks from our province robbing future generations of the chance to experience and understand their history. Decisions about what to preserve are best made locally. This bill should not be passed.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72542

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hard to believe that heritage land once protected is the right choice for a location to build more housing. Kinda seems like a house could be built anywhere but you won't find the features of this land just anywhere.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72543

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have been learning about the proposed legislation, and am very concerned about the implications of Bill 23. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72565

Commentaire fait au nom

Sifton Properties Limited

Statut du commentaire

Please find enclosed Sifton Properties Limited’s (here in known as “Sifton”) review and comment regarding proposed changes through Bill 23, More Homes Built Faster Act, to the Ontario Heritage Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72570

Commentaire fait au nom

Halton Peel Branch, Ontario Genealogical Society

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to you in my capacity as Cemetery Coordinator for the Halton Peel Branch of Ontario Ancestors (Ontario Genealogical Socieity). My concern regarding Bill 23 is the possible damage that may be done to our unregistered cemeteries in Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72574

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'd like to register my opposition to Bill 23, specifically as it relates to the protection of heritage buildings and the environment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72578

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

1. The lack of consultation with the heritage community, local communities or indigenous communities Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72588

Commentaire fait au nom

South Huron, Municipality of

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of the Municipality of South Huron, the following resolution of Council is respectfully submitted. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72592

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please reconsider the motion to allow heritage buildings to be demolished. Developers are all about the money to be made. This is my heritage. Let’s pretend I am an immigration Ontario only it is the buildings of my ancestors. These buildings make Ontario a more interesting place to visit. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72624

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support Bill 23. Certainly *some* red tape exists and fair adjustments might be proposed. In addition to the heritage concerns, the conservation authories should be left to do their important work. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72633

Commentaire fait au nom

Town of Kingsville

Statut du commentaire

Schedule 6 of Bill 23 proposes multiple changes to the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72635

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Proposed Changes to the Ontario Heritage Act and its regulations: Bill 23 (Schedule 6) - the Proposed More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 ERO number 019-6196 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72636

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Given the significance of this legislation and its impact on municipalities, I am extremely disappointed and beyond upset that Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) was not provided an opportunity to present to the Legislature's Standing Committee on Heritage and Culture during its review o Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72638

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal effectively eliminates heritage listing, which, despite being considered "interim" protection, is a less cumbersome and more resource effective way of managing change to heritage properties. Heritage listing is a "win win" for both property owners and municipalities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72643

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The reason that many people choose to live here is because we know our history and appreciate the registry of heritage buildings. This is not an impediment to affordable housing as these buildings and houses exist as residences already. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72645

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am a supporter of indigenous sovereignty, and the protection of the Greenbelt. I am writing to oppose the proposal of Bill 23. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72652

Commentaire fait au nom

Statut du commentaire

I write on behalf of the Port Hope Branch of the Architectural Conservancy of Ontario (ACO) in support of the position taken by the ACO provincial branch, regarding Bill 23, Section 6. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72657

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Brampton

Statut du commentaire

Please find attached comments from the City of Brampton re: Bill 23 - More Homes Built Faster Act and Implications for the City of Brampton. The following recommendation was passed by the Committee of Council at its meeting on November 23, 2022: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72680

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 23 should be shelved until more thought can be given to where new housing in Ontario should be located. Certainly, we should not be paving over chunks of the formerly "protected" greenbelt with the excuse that it is suddenly mandatory that it be developed. Lire davantage