Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

37929

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Of concern in the proposed changes is the use of the PRMA guidelines as the standards. This agency relies on research done by the manufacturers of pesticides, rather than independent studies, and is swamped by the the work it is dealing with at this time. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

37934

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We need to think very seriously about pesticides and the future of this world. The time is NOW. We do not need less control but more if there is any future for our children and grandchildren.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

37937

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Public Health Association

Statut du commentaire

Dear Ms. Asgarali, Re: ERO # 019-0601 - Amendments to the Pesticide Regulation (63/09 General) made under the Pesticides Act, R.S.O. 1990 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

37939

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would encourage the elimination of the public meeting requirement for golf courses. It was and still is a unnecessary practice and a waste of time and resources. Most of us at the meetings spent more time advising the scarce few that attended on how to take care of their lawns at home. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

37942

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Here are my concerns: -PMRA uses primarily industry supplied testing to make decision PMRA is greatly backlogged at present. By federal law, all pesticides are supposed to be re-evaluated every 15 years. The PMRA cannot possibly do this, and they have admitted this. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

37944

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a family doctor, and advocate for climate health, I am very concerned about the proposed changes to pesticide regulations in Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

37947

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

-PMRA uses primarily industry supplied testing to make decision PMRA is greatly backlogged at present. By federal law, all pesticides are supposed to be re-evaluated every 15 years. The PMRA cannot possibly do this, and they have admitted this. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

37951

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Vegetation Management Association

Statut du commentaire

Ontario Vegetation Management Association Comments on Amendments to the Pesticide Regulation 63/09 General Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

37952

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please keep the pesticide ban for cosmetic purposes. It should actually include "round-up" as well, for there is virtually no poison ivy in urban areas, and that was the reason it was left on the shelves. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

37955

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hon. Prabmeet Singh Sarkaria Associate Minister of Small Business and Red Tape Reduction 7th Floor 56 Wellesley St. West Toronto, ON M7A 2E7 Hon. Jeff Yurek Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks 5th Floor 777 Bay St. Toronto, ON M7A 2J3 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

37962

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I support the continued existence and authority of the OPAC . One "Director" is not capable of deciding which pesticides should be added to the cosmetic ban list. Industry supplied testing is not an acceptable standard for decision-making about environmental and health issues. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

37964

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

PMRA uses primarily industry supplied testing to make decision PMRA is greatly backlogged at present. By federal law, all pesticides are supposed to be re-evaluated every 15 years. The PMRA cannot possibly do this, and they have admitted this. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

37966

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I urge you to maintain the current committee and rules regarding pesticides. In particular al neonicinoides absolutely need to be totally banned , now, not in a few years, but right now. Also 2-4d should not be allowed to be used on lawns. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

37971

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

ALL neonictinoid tracking (of seed sales, of independent assessment of need, and of use) should remain in place. Three of the most dangerous neonics have now been slated for removal (experts have called for IMMEDIATE removal- the worst one, Imidacloprid, won't come off until 2021. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

37983

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The new regulation combines Class 2, 3 and 4 but enforces training and certification on farmers that was not required previously in the existing regulation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

37989

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The ipm info for golf courses is readily at hand for anybody to see. Since the inception of ipm annual meetings, we have had 3 guests attend 2 of our meetings. These guests were not even concerned about pesticide use, but more concerned about infrastructure and construction. Lire davantage