Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93701

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am in favour of reducing red tape in the NEC area. However, this proposal covers making it easier and less red tape for installation of utilities or repairs on bridges etc. How about ease of obtaining a permit for homeowners that want to undertake a project. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93702

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We are very concerned about giving NEC greater compliance tools to regulate non compliant development such as a officer. Is this really a problem in the NEC area or is this the result of halton conservation having its regulatory authority removed ? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93711

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am in favour of reducing red tape and other parts of this proposal however, i am not in favour of NEC adopting greater abilities to inspect and address non compliant development activities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93713

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I think not publishing the proposals in a news paper or some other way of getting it in the news to the Ontario public is like making the changes behind their backs . Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94043

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I think that removing newspaper requirement is fine and I support broadening the range of compliance tools for violations. However I am concerned about expanding the Ministers regulation making powers with respect to permitted uses in the Niagara Escarpment area. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94791

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

November 22, 2023 Public Input Coordinator MNRF- RPDPB –Natural Heritage Section 300 Water St., 2nd Floor South Peterborough, ON K9J 3C7 Dear Public Input Coordinator: Re: ERO 019-7696, Bill 139 Niagara Escarpment Planning and Development Act Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94973

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is just to make it easier for developers to build on the escarpment. It will not protect the environment and therefore I am opposed to building on the Niagara Escarpment and on the greenbelt.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95057

Commentaire fait au nom

Bruce Trail Conservancy

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed amendments to the Niagara Escarpment Planning and Development Act. The Bruce Trail Conservancy's comments are included in the attached letter. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

95065

Commentaire fait au nom

Conservation Ontario

Statut du commentaire

Please find attached Conservation Ontario's comments on the “Proposed amendments to the Niagara Escarpment Planning and Development Act" (ERO 019-7696). Conservation Ontario thanks the Province for the opportunity to provide feedback on this proposal. Lire davantage