Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149516

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The government should not loosen the requirements for recycling. The producers said they could do this job better than municipalities and should not get out of this deal. It is critical that we increase recycling and reuse of packaging and products ASAP. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149521

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The proposed amendment to make access to blue box collection for small businesses more accessible - does not go far enough. Small business must be included in the transitioned system and be included as eligible sources and materials. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149522

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario First Nations Technical Services Corporation

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
ITEM 11: Update Timelines for Providing Blue Box Services Current requirement: - The current regulation has no timelines for: o Servicing newly built residences o Servicing facilities that have registered after 2026 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149524

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As an Ontario consumer, this is a major step backward. I diligently compost and recycle and have lived abroad where requirements for recycling are much more onerous than here. Recycling was not optional and producers were required to clearly label materials to facilitate recycling. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149552

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The focus of this transition should be holistic in the sense that waste management is a global issue and that waste diversion needs to be maximized for the overall health of the planet. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149565

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am against this amendment. All Ontario residents should have equal access to the Blue Box Program so it should be rolled out to all Multi res and medium /high density residences across the province. This sounds like they are trying to get out of their commitment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149584

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This proposal is a terrible choice for our residents and the environment. We need to think beyond a price tag and do what is best for the people who will live in this area. Do not go ahead with this plan.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149585

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Go back to the drawing board and do better. This is not a sustainable approach and will impact the quality of the air we breathe and have major health implications for communities that live in proximity to plants with incinerators/kilns. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149586

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Producers have to be held accountable for their products. Plastic incineration is NOT recycling. Recycling goals should be kept and not postponed. I strongly disagree with proposed changes Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149588

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I do NOT support these changes. If this change allows for the burning of non-recyclable plastic waste in incinerators or to fuel lime kilns, this will be a disaster for the environment and, more specifically, to my local community. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149589

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
For the proposed energy recovery - does this mean burning the ‘non recyclables’ for fuel? What does this do to the environment in terms of pollution? How do you make this safe? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149611

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This proposal is simply irresponsible. Corporations need more stringent laws to encourage reduction in waste materials period. They should be solely responsible for the waste generated by their products- it’s the only way to drive change. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149613

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This should not be lowed. We should not be burning items that should be recycled. The companies that produce these items needs to look after a way to recycle these products. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149616

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Huge environmental concerns on how dangerous it would be to our air, water and agriculture if this proposal goes through. This proposal would allow toxic material to be burned at the Carmeuse lime kiln located in the Lafarge quarry in Flamborough. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149619

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
“Energy recovery” is a veiled reference to burning plastics rather than recycling them. This is absolutely unacceptable and will result in toxic emissions which will pollute our air, water and agricultural land.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149620

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I strongly do not support this amendment. It is a distinct step backwards, in a market-favoring decision which will not benefit Ontarian citizens or our environment - more precisely, it will directly harm people just to appease corporate profits. Lire davantage