Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170628

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Bill 5 is not a conservation bill—it’s a development bill wearing a green mask. By repealing the Endangered Species Act and replacing it with the SCA, Ontario has turned species protection into a system of permits, registrations, and exceptions. That is not protection. That is controlled demolition.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170629

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Schedule 2 of Bill 5 guts the Endangered Species Act while pretending to modernize it. The new Species Conservation Act centralizes power in the government’s hands and reduces species protection to a checkbox process. Science no longer leads. Profit does.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170630

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The shift from evidence-based species designation to government-controlled permitting opens the door to unchecked destruction. These changes don’t streamline conservation—they weaponize it. Species can now be erased by omission, deregulation, or silence. The SCA is not an upgrade. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170631

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The registration and exception model introduced under the SCA is a blueprint for legalizing harm. It sets the default to “yes” for destruction, with only mild procedural barriers. It weakens the system so thoroughly that protection becomes optional.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170632

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The removal of aquatic species and federally protected migratory birds from the Ontario list is not efficiency—it’s abandonment. Duplicated protection was never the problem. The problem is that these species are dying, and this legislation is accelerating their disappearance.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170633

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
With Bill 5, Ontario has created an endangered species system where exemptions can be stacked, registrations rushed, and destruction made invisible. The government calls it modernization. In reality, it’s a deregulation scheme with irreversible consequences.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170634

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Repealing the ESA during a biodiversity crisis is indefensible. Replacing it with legislation that hands out exceptions before protections are even enforced is a betrayal of every species depending on human restraint. This is not legislation—it’s permission to vanish.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170635

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Species Conservation Act strips away ecological protections in order to enable development. It’s built to serve industries, not ecosystems. From habitat destruction to species removal, the SCA formalizes loss—and calls it balance.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170636

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The 64 special concern species dropped from the protected list, along with 42 aquatic and migratory species, represent more than just data points. These are frontline victims of deregulation. The SCA removes them from sight, but not from risk. This is environmental erasure.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170638

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Removing aquatic species from Ontario’s protection list because they are “already covered” federally is a dangerous abdication of responsibility. Dual protection was never the problem—mass extinction is. Ontario should reinforce protections, not dismantle them.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170639

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Aquatic ecosystems are collapsing under the weight of pollution, habitat loss, overfishing, and climate change. The SCA’s removal of 42 aquatic species from provincial protection is not coordination—it’s jurisdictional dodgeball. Lives are being passed around until they disappear.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170640

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Just because a species is protected federally doesn’t mean it’s safe. Provincial permits, resource extraction, and infrastructure development often bypass federal enforcement. Duplicated protections existed to catch what one system missed. Removing them is reckless.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170641

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This legislation should include all of the species identified to be at risk, even if there are protections federally.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170642

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Water crosses boundaries. Watersheds, rivers, migratory routes—none of them obey provincial lines. By offloading protection to federal acts, Ontario is effectively removing itself from any meaningful responsibility for aquatic survival.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170643

Commentaire fait au nom

Canadian Renewable Energy Association

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
About Canadian Renewable Energy Association (CanREA) CanREA is the leading national industry association advocating for wind energy, solar energy, energy storage and behind-the-meter solar & storage solutions in support of a reliable, affordable, and non-emitting electricity system. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170644

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The so-called “streamlining” of species protection means that industries impacting aquatic habitats will now face fewer roadblocks. This includes dam projects, pipelines, dredging, mining, and waste discharge. The SCA has legalized shortcuts to ecosystem collapse.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170645

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Many of the aquatic species being removed from the list are already facing severe habitat fragmentation. Provincial protection offered an additional barrier against development. Without it, industries now face one less challenge to exploiting these waterways.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170647

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The fact that this is even up for debate in 2025 shows the profound lack of good judgement from the Ford government. I am deeply disappointed that Ford continues to prioritize his corporate greed over every plant, animal, and person in the province. NO to removing environmental protections. Lire davantage