Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

32755

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Policies always sound great but it's how they will be implemented that concerns me. Reducing barriers and red tape usually means make it easier for developers to make money at the expense of the environment. Barriers and "red tape" were put there for a reason. Read more

Comment ID

32770

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We should ensure developers build affordable prices units next to higher priced builds. Right now we are awash in 500k+ suburban houses but not a single unit goes up next door or across the road for a reasonable price. We have to enforce a mix.

Comment ID

32853

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There should not be any increased housing land on forested and/or protected areas like the Oakridges Moraine, for example. It is our understanding that there is plenty of land for housing, which does not interfere with the protection of forests and moraines and aquifers.

Comment ID

33488

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Proposals for the building of so-called "tiny" homes are something that I have long advocated for. This point seems to have been addressed in the new Policy Statement. A return to the post WWII housing of the "two-up, two-down" type is greatly needed, as well as other small home types. Read more

Comment ID

33545

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Housing developments should be limited to currently-developed land. Infill of urban spaces, and re-purposing and refurbishing of vacant/abandoned buildings in urban centres - NOT sprawl into undeveloped, rural land which should be reserved for nature. Read more

Comment ID

33560

Commenting on behalf of

Mulmur Township

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
• It is unclear as to the extent that Part II wording may impact Council decision making. The implications of this new wording should be further discussed with respect to Council’s ability to decline from entering into agreements, such as responsibility agreements for communal servicing. Read more