Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

61852

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Need clarity on how this would be implemented as current zoning bylaw setbacks and maximum coverage would often restrict any new unit construction on single detached unit lots especially in newly developed areas that are often built to the limits or close to the limits of the existing zoning bylaws Read more

Comment ID

62022

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Thank you, Primer Ford. This was long due. Please make sure that the city and towns follow the good work you are doing. Let the cities and towns not try to put red tape and find loop holes for them to avoid doing this

Comment ID

62029

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is with reference to the proposed "More Homes Built Faster Act". If the intent is to permit 3 units per lot only in "settlement areas with full municipal water and sewage services", then the vast majority of "rural communities" is left out of this proposal. Read more

Comment ID

62112

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
re ERO number019-6197 Developers should NOT be relieved of paying "development charges" to pay for infrastructure, green space, etc. They have some social responsibility to create liveable neighbourhoods while they are enriching themselves so they can live a very privileged lifestyle elsewhere.

Comment ID

62118

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
One of the boldest steps by Ford to solve the housing crisis. If this bill is able to remove the red tape, people will find ways to make it work. Only more homes can solve this crisis. This is the only way as the province do not have the resources to develop outside infrastructure. Read more

Comment ID

62131

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The province and cities are concerned about low cost rental housing. As a small landlord with forty years of experience, let me advise you about one important fact. You are working against yourself to get where you want to be. Read more

Comment ID

62258

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do not support Bill-23 and the removal of R1 zoning. I specifically did not vote for the mayoral candidate who supported this initiative. While I understand the need for intensification and providing affordable housing to people, this will not address the issue. Read more

Comment ID

62656

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Stop Bill 23. We are in a climate crisis. It will not provide the truly affordable and sustainable housing we need. What it will do is kill birds and wildlife, destroy vital green space and wildlife habitats, result in development of unsuitable and environmentally significant areas (i.e. Read more

Comment ID

63377

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
What about vacant land/property in settlement areas with full municipal water and sewage services? It is not clear if "parcels of land," as defined in the proposed regulation for additional residential units (up to 3) also apply to new homes to be constructed on vacant land/property. Read more