Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

176130

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This comment is submitted to oppose amalgamation Cataraqui Regional Conservation Authority (CRCA) into the proposed St Lawrence Regional Conservation Authority. Stewardship of the lakes and lands in the CRCA should remain in the hands of the people who live and work and play in the region. Read more

Comment ID

176131

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This will weaken the ability to protect people and property from natural hazards like flooding and erosion, including a diminished role in development and planning decisions, and the loss of local watershed expertise. Read more

Comment ID

176136

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Province has not provided key information about how the merger will be done, so we cannot fully assess it's impact: from governance and costs, to timing, staffing, land management, branding, and community impact. Nor has the Province provided evidence showing why this merger is necessary. Read more

Comment ID

176137

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly disagree with the proposed Bill 68 to amalgamate 36 conservation authorities to 7 regional authorities. Local Conservation Authorities are extremely important when it comes to reforestation and the environment. Read more

Comment ID

176143

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The proposal to combine conservation authorities is based on a wrong premise that it will improve operations. A read of the Proposal does not provide evidence that it will improve efficiency or effectiveness. Read more

Comment ID

176148

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do not support this proposal. I agree with Hamilton Conservation Authority's submission to the ERO. I am concerned about losing local decision-making and I support keeping conservation decisions rooted in our community.”

Comment ID

176152

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There is no need for 36 separate conservation authorities, just like there is no need for 78 school boards. Both could easily be divided into three or four parts of Ontario and could be far more effective at a fraction of the administrative overhead. Read more

Comment ID

176154

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Nith Valley EcoBoosters, a volunteer organization that has served the communities of Wilmot and Wellesley Townships for more than ten years. Read more

Comment ID

176155

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing as a resident of Wellesley and as someone who has long valued the essential work of the Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) in protecting our community, our drinking water, and the health of the Nith River watershed. Read more

Comment ID

176156

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Dec 14, 2025 RE: Bill 68 and ERO #025-1257 I live in the southern part the Huron-Bruce provincial riding and offer some comments on the proposed Ontario Provincial Conservation Agency and restructuring of conservation authority boundaries. Read more