Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

36425

Commentaire fait au nom

Durham Region Chapter of the Ontario Building Officials Association

Statut du commentaire

November 21, 2019 Building Services Transformation Branch 777 Bay Street, 16th floor Toronto, ON M5G 2E5 Canada To whom it may concern, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

36448

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello, I work as an OAA architect. I believe this proposal will add red tape, liability and unnecessary duplication to the building approval process. I do not support this proposal. Thank you for your consideration.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

36465

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

To Whom It May Concern, Please accept my response to the MMAH consultation on Transforming and modernizing the delivery of Ontario’s Building Code services. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

36472

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Windsor

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for the opportunity to comment. The City of Windsor response on the consultation is attached. John Revell, CBO Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

36477

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

My concern is with the BCIN certified designers. The MMAH developed a system for non-architect designers to design million dollar projects, but MMAH does not have a code of ethics, no enforcements, no continuing education requirements. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

36484

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Association of Architects

Statut du commentaire

This proposal reads as complete "gobbeldy gook". It is so completely full of cliches and generalizations that is almost completely useless. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

36485

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The current online Code is not very helpful. It is incomplete, unsearchable and does not take advantage of available software technology to facilitate deployment. Also, the MOH information line is understaffed. It takes a long time to get a call returned. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

36489

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am a licensed architect with over 25 years of experience in both the construction and architectural industries. Every majour submission I've been involved in (not a single family house) resulted in miscommunication, extensive delay and lack of recourse when applications weren't simple. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

36585

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I recommend the government reconsider adding more red tape and cost by creating a certified professional model. I recommend the government mandate more training for Architects and empower them to provide the role of certified professional. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

36663

Commentaire fait au nom

Canadians for Properly Built Homes

Statut du commentaire

Canadians for Properly Built Homes has four key concerns: 1. Emphasis is on Elliott Lake shopping mall catastrophe, without recognition of consequences for owners of newly built homes stuck with Code violations; 2. Insufficient focus on Code-compliant newly built homes; Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

36680

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

To Whom It May Concern, Please accept my response to the MMAH consultation on Transforming and modernizing the delivery of Ontario’s Building Code services. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

36711

Commentaire fait au nom

Chief Building Officials of Niagara

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of the Chief Building Officials of Niagara, I would like to offer the attached document in response to the in response to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing consultation on "Transforming and Modernizing the Delivery of Ontario's Building Code Services. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

36717

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

These changes to increase oversight do not support the provincial governments promise of less reporting and less red tape. The charges proposed will increase municipal Building Service Costs by 3.14% (3.62% for Admaston/Bromley) based on 2018 FIRs. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

36723

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I believe the introduction of an Administrative Authority will add significant red tape, liability and unnecessary duplication to a building approval process that is already not working efficiently or effectively. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

36725

Commentaire fait au nom

Town of Wasaga Beach

Statut du commentaire

Attached are answers to questions posed via the discussion paper. The Town of Wasaga Beach is supportive of the governments efforts to modernize building code service delivery. Lire davantage