Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41267

Commentaire fait au nom

Citizens for Safe Ground Water

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
-Concerned with the permit application to draw water. -Concerned with the application to install wash ponds onsite, risk of contamination to neighboring wetland that is the immediate vicinity. Also concerned of contamination of Source Water Protection Area, Waterloo moraine, and private wells. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41309

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
There are only two words FRESH WATER. Don't let anyone propose to endanger their water OUR water. We Canadians are so fortunate to have fresh water. Why would you put that in jeopardy? Why would you expose the people that live here to that? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41314

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Hello, There is just NO benefit to the citizens living in the surrounding areas to the proposed gravel pit and asphalt business. Why put a gravel and asphalt business adjacent to a village, where so many people live? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41316

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Clearly the only experts in this scenario are those representing the applicant. The kangaroo court nature of this application are becoming more obvious. While I may just be a working stiff it seems pretty clear that the applicant will condone anything which suits their agenda. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41329

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The consideration of the carbon emissions from the extraction of aggregate - in total as a process including the transportation, and its use in making cement - one of the primary producers of carbon dioxide, is very much overdue. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41332

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I oppose this application. The application does not take into account the community in regard to hours of operation. The hours of operation must reduce the impact on the community. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41342

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This license must not be issued; this project poses far too great of a risk to groundwater in the region. More “red tape” is required in all permits of this kind, our current government is moving in the completely wrong direction.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41366

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The following are significant factors against allowing this project : -hydrogeological report not sufficient according to experts -wash ponds -permit to draw water -recycling (asphalt and concrete) Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41371

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please see the attached document that describes risks related to air and noise pollution from the proposed gravel pit . Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41418

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I have concerns when our water can be negatively affected by industrial uses: wash ponds and the impact to surface water flow to provincially significant wetland. I have heard that the hydrogeological report not sufficient according to experts. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41530

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
There are many concerns about this venture. My biggest is the fact it will be dug on top of our water source. Not only is this dangerous to our communities it is irresponsible.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41560

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
In my humble opinion there are already water by laws in effect in this region to protect our groundwater and this pit jeopardizes that even further this region has a commitment to protecting groundwater yet allowing 20000 tons of aggregate to be removed from the table per year is not only irresponsi Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41562

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Because this proposed quarry is located in an aquifer recharge area for Waterloo Region I'm very much opposed to it. A significant portion of the region's water supply originates in this area. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41564

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I object to the proposed gravel pit. I have grave concerns around the effects this project will have on our ground water and overall environmental footprint.. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41720

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
RE: Proposed Aggregate Extraction at 1894-1922 Witmer Road, Wilmot Jackson Harvest Farms Ltd. ERO number 019-1094 Ministry reference number 95-2019-187 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41733

Commentaire fait au nom

Citizens for Safe Ground Water

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Wetland Concerns -Locally significant (as described by the GRCA) "Schindelsteddle South Weland Complex". Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41743

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As an informed citizen (professional engineer & Ph.D. in healthcare governance), who is impacted by a possible decision to allow an aggregate facility in the proposed location, I have the following concerns: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

41746

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Environmental Registry of Ontario Reference: Proposed Gravel Pit 1894-1922 Witmer Road, Petersburg Jackson Harvest Farms Ltd. Comments on reports submitted with application at public meeting January 13 2020. Water 1. Issue: removal of natural capital (filtration) Lire davantage