Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59150

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is about time. Pits and Quarries are the most suitable sites for excess fill to be hauled and placed, under a controlled system. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59256

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

General rules cannot be made for land where aggregate mining has taken place. Each location requires its own unique, individual impartial environmental assessment. Soil/excess soil must all be analyzed before moving/dumping. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59327

Commentaire fait au nom

The Oxford Coalition for Social Justice

Statut du commentaire

The following comments are offered in good faith by the Oxford Coalition for Social Justice in order to assist the NDMNRF in improving their proposal related to bringing excess soil onto aggregate zones for rehabilitation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59340

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Federation of Agriculture

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture, please find attached our submission regarding ERO # 019-4801 (Proposed regulatory changes for the beneficial reuse of excess soil at pits and quarries in Ontario). Thank you. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59344

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Pits and quarries are by nature usually very permeable land forms, cotributing to the filtration of rain waters and filtering and admitting them to the water table. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59345

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The timeline is too short to address this ERO. An extension of at least another 60 days would provide community groups, municipalities, scientists,and others an opportunity to properly analyse the proposed regulations and their implications. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59348

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Stone, Sand & Gravel Association

Statut du commentaire

See attached for comments from the Ontario Stone, Sand & Gravel Association on ERO 019-4801. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59349

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is impossible to believe that a responsible government would give this proposal any attention what so ever. The pollution issues are staggering. Dumping unqualified material next to our exposed water tables is complete folly. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59350

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

1. The timeline is too short to address this ERO. An extension of at least another 60 days would provide community groups, municipalities, scientists, and others an opportunity to properly analyse the proposed regulations and their implications. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59354

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

These proposed regulations represent significant threats to communities, ecosystems, farmland, surface and groundwater due to the lack of appropriate soil testing before dumping in pits containing groundwater. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59355

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Spent pits and quarries should be rehabilitated not turned into dumps for soil from construction sites. Any soil that touches the water table should be preinspected for contamination and rejected should any exist in any quantity. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59359

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There is no justification for dumping soil into groundwater. Placing soil into groundwater has the potential for disastrous results on the surrounding community! You must remove any reference to placing soil into groundwater. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59360

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

1. The timeline is too short to address this ERO. An extension of at least another 60 days would provide community groups, municipalities, scientists, and others an opportunity to properly analyze the proposed regulations and their implications. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59364

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I object to these proposed changes for the following reasons: 1. The permitted comment period for this posting is too brief. I would suggest an additional 60 days would be appropriate to allow for adequate input. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59388

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello and thank you for the opportunity to submit comments. I have a background as a heavy equipment operator and natural gas underground pipe repair tech. Also some experience with toxic spills and soils contaminated by leaching. Here is an example of leaching. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59400

Commentaire fait au nom

United Soils Management Limited

Statut du commentaire

Comments are from experience in operating a fill site at a former sand and gravel pit: 1. Site soil should be used to establish grade above the water table, before excess soil is imported. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59408

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Personal comments from Alec Cloke, Principal, United Soils Management on issues related to the proposed changes to regulation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59416

Commentaire fait au nom

North Shore Environmental Resource Advocates Inc. (NSERA)

Statut du commentaire

Re: ERO 019-4801 Proposed regulatory changes for the beneficial reuse of excess soil at pits and quarries in Ontario Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

59417

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Regarding the Best Management Practices for Aggregate Pit and Quarry Rehabilitation document (page 18), can material that meets Tables 2.1 and 3.1 for properties with potable and non-potable water respectively be brought (and placed above the water table) to ARA licensed properties without amending Lire davantage