Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93779

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I live in rural Eastern Ontario. I am deeply, deeply concerned about the proposals to loosen controls water takings for construction site dewatering activities and foundation drain. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93783

Commentaire fait au nom

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The move to streamline permissions for temporary water taking activities at construction sites is a significant step towards efficiency. It's reassuring to note that while the volume limit would be removed, and that environmental impact remains a top priority. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93786

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I do not agree with the proposal to streamline permissions for large scale water takings by anyone. Water is a common resource that we must all share and to make this work we must all have oversight over how it is used. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93802

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a resident of Ontario, I am opposed to this for these reasons: • I insist that study MUST be done to fully understand the impact of water taking on each individual site • I demand that public consultation and input MUST continue to be part of the granting of water taking permits Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93808

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I oppose Ontario’s proposal under ERO number 019-6853 to remove the current limit and allow up to 379,000 litres of groundwater-taking per day without permit. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93811

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Your intended amendments are very worrisome. Streamlining usually means cutting corners and we know what that means with this government. After the scathing reports from the Ontario Auditor General regarding the Green Belt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93816

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
please insist: insisting that study MUST be done to fully understand the impact of water taking on each individual site demanding that public consultation and input MUST continue to be part of the granting of water taking permits Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93819

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Dewatering activities should be completely overhauled with the scientific evidence is that is required. L

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93820

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I implore this government to re-evaluate the need to streamline water takings for construction sites for the sake of speed and development. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93821

Commentaire fait au nom

Terrapex Environmental Ltd.

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Ontario is proposing to make residential foundation drainage systems exempt from requiring a PTTW for water taking of up to 379,000 litres of water per day. For water taking of more than 379,000 litres of water per day from residential foundation drainage systems, a PTTW will still be required. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93826

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am totallt opposed to sel-regulation in instances were there are monetary benefits. I am a Registerd Psychologist and totally support the Regulatory mechanisms that apply to my profession. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93832

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
ERO 019-6951 streamline permit-by-rule framework ERO 019-6853 streamline water taking for construction site dewatering ERO 019-6928 streamline environmental stormwater management ERO 019-6963 streamline permissions for waste management systems Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93838

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The County of Brant submits: • Who will monitor the water quality of the discharge for foundation drain dewatering or PTTW dewatering? Who will monitor these impacts to source water or ground water resources? • Water taking amounts taken is a concern at 400,000 L/day. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93839

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Dear Sirs, I do not support the regulatory changes proposed. Surely, there are ways to improve efficiency without removing oversight and review prior to approval. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93844

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Subject: Proposed revisions by the Ontario Government to the Environmental Protection Act RSO 1990 – References Notice 019-6951, Water Taking: 019-6853 & Storm Water: 019-6928 ERSA – Environmental Activity and Sector Registry Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93848

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I feel streamlining the regulatory process by offering Permit by Rule by self registration using EASR for water taking for construction sites and foundations drains would be detrimental for the Environment. I am opposed to this proposal.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93854

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
"...This would allow someone to self-register on the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry (EASR) ...Furthermore, Ontario is proposing to remove the current requirements to notify the local conservation authority of the water taking" -- This suggests that the registration is completely on an ho Lire davantage