Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93675

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
STOP. Do not proceed. This proposal is sacrificing and an affront to environmental rights. You also must get the free, prior, informed consent of all First Nations and Indigenous communities with territory in or significant relationships with the province. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93682

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
'Reduced burden' is a totally reckless concept when dealing with such a sensitive issue. This Provincial government is causing enormous harm to the natural environment and, eventually, this will become more than evident in the consequences to humans. The clock is ticking. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93718

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
379,000 litres of groundwater-taking PER DAY is an unacceptable number! The implication is that the construction is occuring on a wetland which we should be preserving. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93722

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Absolutely NOT! We need MORE oversight and excellent quality monitoring of our water! We need scientists checking on all construction proposals that could taint our water in any way! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93728

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Regulatory frameworks such as the Clean Water Act and the Ontario Water Resources Act were designed to manage and protect our shared water resources, ecosystems, and health. Key regulatory tools that currently protect our water include: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93732

Commentaire fait au nom

Transition to Less Waste (TTLW)

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Hon. David Piccini, Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks 5 th Floor, 777 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario M7A 2J3 Delivered via email: minister.mecp@ontario.ca, permissions.modernization@ontario.ca September 18, 2023 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93735

Commentaire fait au nom

Transition to Less Waste (TTLW)

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Hon. David Piccini, Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks 5 th Floor, 777 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario M7A 2J3 Delivered via email: minister.mecp@ontario.ca, permissions.modernization@ontario.ca September 18, 2023 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93737

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
this Proposal is ill conceived and not in the public interest. The current process or a stricter one, must be kept in place requiring specific approval for any waste movement plan or proposal. Please reconsider lessening of existing Enviromental controls or approvals required. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93740

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I object to the changes in how aggregate extraction permits are to be approved, given the effect pits and quarries can have on communities, neighbours, traffic, the environment, property values, and quality of life. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93748

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I do not support this proposal for streamlining permissions for Water taking. There needs to be accountability by the Ministry. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93749

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Streamlining is a nice word, but in this case, it means disregarding the seriously important measure to assess the risk taking for "water taking" permits. To allow developers to "self regulate" is appalling. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93755

Commentaire fait au nom

Groundwater Environmental Management Services Inc. (GEMS)

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
For the Proposed regulatory amendments to O. Reg. 63/16 under the Environmental Protection Act 1. What defines “more complex water taking” that will be subject to the ministry review? How is that triggered? Will there be a review period? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93758

Commentaire fait au nom

Oxford Environmental Action Committee

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Regarding: Our Sept 18, 2023 Request for Extension of Public Comment Periods for ERO Numbers 019-6928, 019-6853, 019-6963, and 019-6951 to a Minimum of 145 Days Dear Hon. Andrea Khanjin, Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93763

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am writing in opposition of the ERO# 019-6853. With recent and ongoing dealings with the aggregate industry, I see nothing but turmoil for communities, our ecosystems, drinking water and our health should such a proposal be allowed to pass. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93768

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
ERO #019-6853 Allowing up to 379,000 litres of groundwater-taking per day without a permit threatens aquifers, impacts wells, and strains municipal infrastructure Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93770

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is a step in the right direction to streamline the approval process for municipal infrastructure projects like watermain and sewer construction. I support this change.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

93772

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am deeply disturbed by many of the changes to streamline permits and environmental permissions in Ontario, including ERO number 019-6951, ERO number 019-6853, ERO number 019-6963, and ERO number 019-6928. Lire davantage