Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

28177

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I agree with the proposal to provide more affordable housing options and infilling cities by adding second units to homes, etc. however, "housing options" is such a vague and useless concept, that it makes me doubt the objectives of the plan. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

28561

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I dont agree with the deferral of development charges for commercial developments. Deferrals should only be used for developments that help those in need such as rentals or low income properties.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

28562

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

How does the government plan or propose to ensure developers actually pass on the savings onto the end customer when buying a home. The proposal appears to benefit the developer who will benefit from capped development charges and sell or rent at market rates, thereby pocketing increased profit. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

28691

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is unclear to me how you can calculate a cap on the proposed community benefits charge based on land values at the time of building permit issuance. Who determines the land value at that time? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

29759

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Oakville does not need further development. Any additional housing will compromise the local environment and contribute to road congestion. High density housing is not the right solution for this town. Having green space and drivable roads is important to our communities.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

29778

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We do NOT need more development. We NEED more climate action! More environmental protections! The last thing we need is more development! Even considering this is a horrible idea. Please, think of the legacy you want to leave for your children

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

29871

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This bill is a total waste of time and money. Both Liberals and Conservatives voted to reform the OMB giving more say to the municipalities. The LPAT hasn't even had a chance but the rich developers have lobbied the PCs to go back to the OMB set up. This bill is totally unnecessary!!!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31028

Commentaire fait au nom

The Corporation of the Town of Georgina

Statut du commentaire

Please be advised that Town Council passed a motion concerning proposed Bill 108 - More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019, to send correspondence to the Province requesting an extension of the June 1st timeline on the Environmental Registry for comments on proposed Bill 108 - More Homes, More Choice Act, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31096

Commentaire fait au nom

Canahahns Company Limited

Statut du commentaire

I would also give consideration to creating a new rate class for purpose built rental housing that can be set at a lower rate than "for-sale" housing. As well, I would also look at the policies of municipalities that increasingly set the benchmark for "small" units smaller and smaller. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31536

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Toronto

Statut du commentaire

Please see attached the City of Toronto's comments regarding Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31552

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am a member of ACO Cambridge and North Dumfries and heritage matters to me. I am deeply concerned about Bill 108 - (Schedule 11) - the proposed More Homes, More Choices Act: Amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31556

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Parks Association

Statut du commentaire

May 28, 2019 John Ballantine, Manager Municipal Finance Policy Branch Municipal Affairs and Housing 13th Floor, 777 Bay Street Toronto, ON M5G 2E5 Re: Ontario Parks Association’s Response to Bill 108 Dear Mr. Ballantine, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31571

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 180 is putting developers before people. Why is the provincial government changing its motto to "For the Developers". Doug Ford promised to be "For the People".

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31575

Commentaire fait au nom

Federation of North Toronto Residents Associations

Statut du commentaire

Preliminary Comments on Bill 108: More Homes, More Choice Act 1. Significantly reduces opportunities for public input in planning - more decision-making at LPAT which ignores Council's decisions where residents had a voice Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31581

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposal does not give any conditions to improve affordability, it regresses on ability of local municipalities that have well thought out development plans to maintain them and favours developers over communities.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31583

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am gravely concerned about Bill 108 and the proposed changes in particular to the development charges act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31589

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have already mailed a letter to Ford himself in regards to the destruction this change would cost. But as he is for profit and ignorant to what his people need I will comment here in the hopes those in charge will listen. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31599

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I heartily concur with the City of Toronto's nigh-unanimous opposition to Bill 108; and, to the City's issues, concerns, and suggestions regarding Bill 108, particularly as the Bill adversely impacts the Development Charges Act.