Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32562

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed change to Ontario Regulation 82/98 to remove discounted services, does this include Development Charge Background Study costs as this is a "Discounted Service" ?

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32585

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

A maximum interest rate for deferred development charges should be imposed by the Province, perhaps in line with the Bank of Canada rate. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32586

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

• Allowing municipalities, the power to prescribe the interest rates for DC deferrals will likely discourage developers from constructing purpose built rental. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32718

Commentaire fait au nom

Drewlo Holdings Inc. (Developer & Rental Housing Provider)

Statut du commentaire

Drewlo Holdings Inc. agrees with the Province's assessment; development charges are a major demand on the cashflow of new development - particularly for cost-sensitive forms of housing such as purpose-built rental. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32747

Commentaire fait au nom

Town of Tecumseh

Statut du commentaire

Please refer to attached PDF document for the Town of Tecumseh's formal submission regarding the proposed Bill 108 regulations. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32794

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please see attached comments from our Development Charge Consultants, which represents the Town of Mono in this regard.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32802

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please see the below link to the County of Grey's comments on Bill 108: More Homes, More Choices Act, Environmental Registry Posting Numbers 019-0181, 019-0183, and 019-0184 and the Proposed Regulation changes under the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act, 19-MAG007. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32829

Commentaire fait au nom

Regional Municipality of Niagara

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of the Commissioner of Planning and Development Services of the Regional Municipality of Niagara, attached is Niagara’s comments to Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing “Proposed changes to O. Reg. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32833

Commentaire fait au nom

Town of Penetanguishene

Statut du commentaire

Submission by the Town of Penetanguishene endorsed by Council on July 31, 2019. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32861

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is hard to understand how the provincial government can be so sympathetic to development charges when they currently cover somewhere between 50% and 80% of development costs. Who pays the remainder? TAXPAYERS, that’s who! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32885

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please allow municipalities to say No to developments that destroy habitat. Please repeal the Ontario Municipal Board. Please do not make it easier for developers to destroy natural areas and farmland. Please change development rules to protect nature, not developers.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

33011

Commentaire fait au nom

London Development Institute

Statut du commentaire

Please accept London Development Institute(LDI) comments and suggestion regarding changes to the Development Charges Act including O.Reg. 82/98 as per Schedule 3 of Bill 108 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

33093

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am asking the government of Ontario to stop legislation known as Bill 108 or at least delay it and provide for public meetings so that citizens and even municipal politicians can understand the impacts of such a wide ranging piece of legislation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

33140

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Markham

Statut du commentaire

Attached is the City of Markham's comments on the proposed regulatory changes to the Development Charges Act, 1997. The attachment includes the Council resolution and recommendations, along with the supporting staff report. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

33144

Commentaire fait au nom

Town of Wasaga Beach

Statut du commentaire

The most important deliverable for the province in Bill 108 implementation is to ensure that the intended savings through new/restricted municipal finance tools are passed down to the consumer to reduce housing prices and increase affordability. Please see the attached letter. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

33190

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Comments on behalf of the City of London regarding proposed changes to O. Reg. 82/98 under the Development Charges Act related to Schedule 3 of Bill 108, More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019. Lire davantage