Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99524

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We were encouraged to buy our residence in Woodbridge by the stated fact that there will never be a high rise in the area, nor asphalt drive way or plazas. Opening Langstaff to 400 was not there but we lived with it when it opened. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99528

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This project is completely unacceptable. As a resident of Woodbridge for over 40 years I have watched our vibrant town turn into a congested, crime-infested, over-populated city. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99529

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Langstaff and 400 on ramp are already congested, how can you allow the use of the MZO which eliminates the need for a transportation study? We have already traffic grid lock on Langstaff in this area Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99530

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am a resident of the neighbourhood and frequently (several times a week) drive though the intersection where the buildings construction is proposed. I cannot understand why this meets the MZO requirements as this does not seem an urgent and critical decision. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99531

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal is not urgent and the use of the MZO process is abusive as it is a direct attempt to circumvent public input and proper planning, transportation and zoning studies. The reasons for this urgency should be carefully considered. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99535

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This makes level of density and congestion makes absolutely no sense. Langstaff is only 2 lanes and there is only southbound access to the 400 from these condos. . There is no access from the 407 to the 400 to get to these condos. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99541

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

no to the proposed 32 " storey building on langstaff and 400 . they population density of this area will be greatly increased without any offering for schools , rec center , outdoor gathering areas , police fire etc etc. these buildings also displace wildlife ie hawks and owls and such. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99542

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

STOP THE PROPOSAL! -There is already gridlock at rush hours to access the highway 400 ramps. Another 4 32+ storey apartments would be a terrible idea, especially without a transportation study. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99543

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support the approval of four 32+ storey appartment buildings on Langstaff and Hwy 400. Weston Rd/Langstaff area is already super busy traffic wise and there is no way current infrastructure can support additional traffic caused by these buildings. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99549

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

-Langstaff and the 400 onramp are already congested, how can you allow the use of an MZO which eliminates the need for a transportation study....we already have traffic gridlock on Langstaff in this area Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99550

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It makes no sense to push this through without proper studies. This development will change the Woodbridge community for the worse in terms of traffic, employment opportunities, overcrowding, and more. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99551

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am concerned about the decision-making process around the development at Langstaff and 400, particularly the use of a Ministerial Zoning Order (MZO) and the lack of sufficient infrastructure planning and assessment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99553

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This cannot proceed without expanding access onto the Hwy400 from Langstaff both North and South and exit from Hwy400 to Langstaff both East and West. Total irresponsible as it relates to traffic management if this is not a critical condition to the proposal.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99554

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

My family and I oppose the 32 plus storey apartment buildings at Langstaff and Hwy400. The area is congested as is and the infrastructure will not support it.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99555

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not agree with this proposal, I do not believe that thorough investigation regarding the infrastructure or urban planning has been adequately conducted to accommodate such a substantial addition to our already congested population and roads in this area of Vaughan. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99556

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose the proposed development at Weston Road and Rutherford ! The increased density will place an additional burden on the already strained resources in the area, not to mention the additional traffic congestion and crime it will create. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

99557

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am totally opposed to the construction of these buildings. The buildings at Weston Road and Highway 7 have added horrible traffic delays. With the proposed construction of these 4 extra buildings, we will be blocked from moving anywhere. Lire davantage