Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

149710

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Province of Ontario should not remove the rights from municipal level authorities to implement regulations/processes that ensure aspects of public-transit connectivity and protecting the environment when applying for new developments. Read more

Comment ID

149716

Commenting on behalf of

Halton Region

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please find attached Halton Region's consolidated comment response letter to Bill 17 related ERO postings No. 025-0450, 025-0461, 025-0462, 025-0463, 025-0504. The letter also includes responses to the Province's Bill 17 Technical Briefing, as well as Regulatory Registry postings. Thank you. Read more

Comment ID

149717

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am firmly opposed to Bill 17, as it presents a serious risk to the future of our green infrastructure industry. If enacted, this bill would remove critical protections, hinder economic progress, and jeopardize environmental sustainability. Read more

Comment ID

149751

Commenting on behalf of

The Corporation of the County of Brant

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed regulations related to complete development application requirements. Please see the attached staff report and comments for details. A summary of the comments is provided below: Read more

Comment ID

149765

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The effort to undo environmental standards will ultimately affect the poor who are also in desperate need of housing. Environmental standards allow us to erect buildings that are integrated into nature instead of having a negative impact on it. Read more

Comment ID

149767

Commenting on behalf of

City of Burlington

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
To Whom It May Concern: Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on ERO posting 025-0462. Please see attached an electronic submission from the City of Burlington. Below are the key points extracted from the submission, c/o of City's Community Planning Department. Read more

Comment ID

149793

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There is vague language here and could apply to many bylaws that cities rely on to protect health, safety, and environmental wellbeing. This will limit the municipal ability to implement bylaws that relate to construction or demolition of buildings. Read more

Comment ID

149803

Commenting on behalf of

Make Good Projects Inc.

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bill 17’s proposal to ban cities from requiring sun/shadow, wind, urban design, or lighting studies is deeply misguided. These are basic considerations for livability, safety, and good planning—especially in dense urban contexts. Read more