Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

172584

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bill 60, the "Fighting Delays, Building Faster Act", restricts municipalities' ability to make informed decisions about public infrastructure, particularly by banning new bike lanes that remove vehicular traffic. Read more

Comment ID

172590

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
bike lanes need to be encouraged rather than widening or adding lanes for cars. Cars are great for inter city travel but within the cities, public transit and environment friendly modes of commuting need to be encouraged. Read more

Comment ID

172593

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Traffic congestion is an issue and thats because there are too many vehicles on the road. Therefore the objective of any new legislation must be to reduce that volume by providing alternatives. Read more

Comment ID

172602

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am saddened and sickened by this proposal. This government has been determined to remove rights from citizens and to benefit the car industry, the gas industry, and the funeral industry thanks to their absolute refusal to provide safe access to active transportation. Read more

Comment ID

172606

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
My first comment was not approved but it is hard to believe that Toronto - a city I have lived and cycled in my whole life is now moving away from safe cycling. Prioritizing cars is not what Torontonians want and Doug Ford himself commented how safe he felt with bike lanes. Read more

Comment ID

172608

Commenting on behalf of

City of Hamilton

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
LRT: This could have implications to the City’s intent to convert the third eastbound lane on Main Street from Dundurn St to Longwood Road as part of the LRT project. Read more

Comment ID

172609

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
No to Bill 60. We need to encourage discussion and increase multiple forms of transit in our city. It allows for people of different income levels the ability to get around. Doug Ford needs to stop this nonsense with Bill 112 and Bill 60. Bikes and bike lanes are not the problem.

Comment ID

172615

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It's frustrating that this bill is an Ontario proposition, when it's clearly a Toronto issue it's targeting. As a Toronto resident of more than 25 years, I disagree with the presumption that getting "cars" moving is the way to make a city more efficient. Read more

Comment ID

172621

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
In many cases there are more vehicle lanes than we need. More lanes encourage more cars and don't alleviate traffic. They just encourage more personal vehicles instead of encouraging public transit, walking, and biking. This is why I am against Bill 60. Read more

Comment ID

172623

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I’m tired of bills, like Bill 60, being pushed on the public by the provincial government without consent and minimizing opportunities for real democratic debate and opposition. Read more

Comment ID

172624

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The "fight" against bike lanes is an anti-evidence outlook driven by a politically regressive premier that is pushing his dated outlook on municipalities - using sleazy tactics like omnibus bills. This is the wrong move for urban planning - by an non-urban-planner.