Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

35725

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

By moving towards a modern digital service, Ontario would be eliminating the administrative burden of processing over 450,000 paper documents for the hazardous waste program. This would support businesses by making it easier to submit all program reports electronically, saving time and money.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

35729

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a Toronto business, we already have three levels of waste reporting, federal, provincial, and municipal. Like CRA collects taxes on behalf of provinces and the feds in one remittance, can you unify and harmonize your reporting with the other two levels of government? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

35731

Commentaire fait au nom

University of Toronto

Statut du commentaire

I agree the HWIN program needs updating as I currently have a excel spreadsheet to keep track of my over 50 login names to access all U of T registered sites. It is most inconvenient and can take up to 5 hours to login, confirm, pay and logout for all fees associated with our sites. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

35732

Commentaire fait au nom

Emterra Group

Statut du commentaire

RPRA has the experience (from the used tire program), capability and capacity to design, implement, and manage a highly efficient and effective modern digital registry. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

35733

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

1. the proposal is vague as to what will be regulated. 2. it appears more administrative burden will be placed on small business rather than less as suggested Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

35734

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

My only concern, as a small business owner, is what additional costs will we now incur in relation to these proposed changes? If they company is now setting their own fees, will we see a huge jump in the costs? Small business cannot afford higher fees.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

35736

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Excellent to see this is catching up with the times. Sincerely hope to see the cost savings trickle down to the clients who are registered. Thank you for this initiative.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

35741

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Fees charged and collected for the new program must remain in the program. Excess funds and the end of the year can be directed to lowering the cost of the service.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

35742

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello, It sounds interesting to go digital. it'd be nice though if we could also have the identification of wastes treatments right away. According to our wastes codes for ex. It will allow us to see our metrics and follow up on our trend. Thank you Sylvia

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

35753

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The movement to digital reporting is a step in the right direction. The current reporting process using paper-based data input is cumbersome and archaic, and prone to error.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

35754

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Moving to a digital program to track waste flow is a good idea. Moving the responsibility for waste administration to non-crown organization is a very bad idea. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

35756

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Missing a lot of details here. Main concern is this read like you're putting responsibility across all waste management sectors to become responsible. Really? You trust private sector? You'd be the sole one to do so. Missing information on costs. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

35925

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is about time the HWIN system was electronic, too much paper waste, the only problem I can see is the system has to be very user friendly, as some of the new government websites are not especially for small businesses.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

36052

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We are operating as a dental clinic generating a small amount of X-ray fixer solution which needs to be removed periodically by a certified carrier. The volume involved is less than 30 litres every 3 years. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

36163

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

How will this work for small generators who pay more for registration than tonnage fees each year? Currently I depend on the disposal companies to ensure my reports are filled up correctly. Lire davantage