Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68087

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is nonsense. We need our wildlife. There is no reason to destroy this area. Wildlife and wildlife habitat play a vital role in the ecological and biological processes that are essential to life itself. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68089

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal is a drastic, poorly thought out, and potentially disastrous plan to solve a crisis with many, many, many better solutions. Lack of supply is not the only problem in the housing crisis, and creating more supply is not a sustainable, long term solution. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68093

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a huge mistake that will have terrible repercussions. We need to protect our green spaces. The highway that will be built is already set to destroy too much land, kill off wildlife. Please do not let this be approved.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68094

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am completely appalled at this proposal and strongly oppose it in any form. The Greenbelt needs to be preserved and should not be used in any way for residential or other development. Doug Ford promised not to touch the greenbelt and this government needs to stick with that promise. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68095

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

You are breaking your promise not to "touch" the Greenbelt. These are protected spaces for a reason. It goes against what the Greenbelt is for. Is there also work being done to address the land within our municipal boundaries to build homes for people? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68096

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am against this proposal. There is no clear plan on how to mitigate urban sprawl, which will become exacerbated with this plan. There is already enough land within developed areas to build mid-rise condos. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68099

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Why is this open for discussion again? Save the greenbelt. Build affordable housing elsewhere. Include affordable housing in existing, in progress and yet to be approved condo development.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68101

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am deeply concerned about the loss of conservation authority powers resulting from this bill. I don’t believe any conservation lands should ever be sold for development, they are needed as habitat and for flood prevention. Therefore no new process for selling off Conservation Lands is needed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68103

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As an Ontario citizen and taxpayer, I do not approve of the proposal to reduce the size of the Greenbelt so that current Greenbelt land can be bulldozed for the profits of land developers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68104

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am very disappointed with the decision to completely ignore the voices of the people of Hamilton that voted AGAINST URBAN SPRAWL. This is a violation of our democracy. I’m ashamed of our premier.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68105

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

That plan proposed by the government to develop in the green belt should not be pursued. The governments plan to add new green space to offset the loss of existing green space should not be pursued. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68109

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Terrible idea! Absolutely irresponsible to develop on our greenbelt. Land is a precious commodity, and we cannot take this lightly - we need to preserve the little protected space we have left. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68110

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to express my opposition to Bill 23 and associated policy proposals that would weaken environmental protections and undermine public involvement in land use planning and decision-making. I am particularly concerned about the: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68111

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The majority of Ontarians want to preserve the green belt! Please continue to protect it & instead use these funds to repurpose empty office spaces & other vacant buildings in Toronto & surrounding area into the low income housing we do desperately need

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68113

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

In the midst of Ontario’s housing crisis this proposal does nothing but put money in the hands of land developers. Single family homes in areas with no infrastructure does nothing to support accessible low income housing, the real source of the housing crisis. Lire davantage