Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94237

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Terrible idea to reduce oversight into something that can cause thousands of dollars in damages for homeowners and millions of dollars of tax payers money when things go awry. These are all short term decisions that don’t help long term. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94243

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Comments on ERO Notices 019-6951, 019-6853, 019-6928 The following are concerns and shortcomings of these proposed rule changes that I am very concerned with: · This legislation would loosen controls on the aggregate extraction industry, and would Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94244

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Removing the requirement for private entities such as builders or developers to adhere to an environmental review process is not a good idea. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94249

Commentaire fait au nom

Waterloo Region Home Builders Assoc

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Input and specific technical recommendations and feedback for considerations. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94253

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This Comment addresses each of the three proposed points of the Proposal. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94257

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please do not proceed with this proposal. There needs to be significant oversight to manage storm water. Small-scale projects add up and if done piecemeal, they will not be as effective as they could be if regulated with a more regional scale in mind, even if the intentions are good (LID). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94258

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We absolutely need a review period and a process that makes sure permit applications are will protect the environment. Do not remove this. When people cut corners, things like the Brenntag fire happens which polluted our water. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94264

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Environmental regulations and reviews protect us all. Yes, it will cost businesses and it will by its nature cause delays to construction. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94265

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Absolutely not. What is it with this govt and their need to bypass public and expert consultation? Is it because developers want to skirt all sound expert advice for property building so they can save a few bucks?

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94266

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is obviously just one more way of letting developers get away with cutting more corners than they already do. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94267

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I do not agree with this proposal. With climate change impacts getting worse and worse, we need stronger regulation and oversight of storm water management - not less. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94273

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This should not be motioned ahead. These provisions to allow small industrial and developers to have responsibility to manage their storm water runoffs are typically not enforced to the fullest extent by contractors. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94274

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Remember the Brenntag fire that polluted Mimico creek because the site didn't have spill protection and runoff found its way into the storm sewers? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94277

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
It is a hallmark of democracy to have open, transparent processes that protect the people and our resources. Thorough environmental review processes are critical and essential in current light of environmental challenges globally and in our backyard. This is an embarrassment to Canada. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94282

Commentaire fait au nom

TRANSITION TO LESS WASTE

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Comments submitted by: Michael G. Farlow, President, Transition to Less Waste (TTLW) and Suzanne Crellin, on behalf of Transition to Less Waste (TTLW) Regarding ERO Proposals: 019-6928, 019-6853, 019-6963, 019-6951 – “Environmental Permissions Modernization” October 30, 2023 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

94288

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We cannot be reducing any safety measures, in fact we should be increasing them! It has barely been 2 months since the chemical spills into Mimico Creek. Lire davantage