Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149939

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am writing to voice my strong opposition to the proposal outlined in Environmental Registry of Ontario notice 025-0009, and in particular, Section 6, which would allow the burning of unrecyclable materials in lime kilns. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149942

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is really concerning. The big push to protect our environment and yet we are endorsing the burning of plastics and garbage. Many of these kilns do not have the resources In place to safely burn garbage. This puts all families at risk living close to any of these facilities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149943

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Hello, Please reconsider the decision to allow companies to burn garbage. This earth is our children and their children’s home. Burning garbage is terrible for current residents and future generations. This is not leadership - this is clearly corruption. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149948

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Here we go again. This smells like Carmeuse all over again. This is absolutely disgusting. But then again, greed always finds a way...especially when you insert politicians and CEOs who need new decks for their Muskoka cottages or the latest set of rims for their Jags.... Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149955

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We do not want this to be passed. We already have so much emissions and pollution from lafarge. Also it would greatly increase the local traffic with trucks which do not consider the other drivers in the roads and create so much traffic and accidents in our area Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149961

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I a strongly oppose the proposal outlined in Environmental Registry of Ontario notice 025-0009, and in particular, Section 6, which would allow the burning of non-recyclable materials in lime kilns. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149969

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I had a read through the proposal and I am concerned about the program being run by producers. Is there any oversight? Additionally, I've heard there are talks of lime kiln burning of waste, has this been approved and by whom? I have heard that these are unsafe and not effective. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149978

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please do not burn recycling or garbage in lime kilns. Burning of garbage effects the air people, animals and food crops from farmland breathe. This cannot be healthy for anyone. At the kiln in Greensville we can smell the toxic smell from the burning at night. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

149995

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Sarnia

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
- why remove the expansion to retirement homes, schools and multi-residential buildings in 2026 and have no date on when they will be part of the program. How are school boards, retirement homes, etc.. to plan for this? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150008

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
With all due respect, please do not destroy our successful Blue Box Recycling programs that need to be expanded and improved - not cut and reduced. Our Provincial leaders need to show they are ready to keep Ontario moving forward not backward. This is the only way to build back trust. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150012

Commentaire fait au nom

Township of Southgate

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Delay recovery targets by 5 years  Recovery targets could be met with the inclusion of curbside IC&I stops and the continuation of community/landfill depot programs.  Concerned that this will put more in the landfills delaying the targets means reducing or delaying the improved Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

150089

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This seems like it’s just kicking the can, probably will do the same in 2031. I understand costs may be higher than expected it that’s just the cost of doing business. Lire davantage