Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

184026

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
It's extremely disappointing that following so much external outreach, being the outreach from external organization and First Nations TO the MCM on this matter, that the only changes that have been incorporated are those that further degrade the diligence required as part of the archaeological asse Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

184027

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Process is more important than product, and we MUST get the process right before proceeding. First Nations and Indigenous communities must be properly and thoroughly consulted before moving forward. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

184028

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Thoroughness in stage 1 and stage 2 assessments are absolutely necessary. Accurate assessments early on will prevent "surprises" later on that will create delays and therefore burdensome costs to developers. I am a resident of the city of Waterloo. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

184029

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The proposed updates to the Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists (S&Gs) Draft 2026 should not be implemented as they currently stand. See attached for my comments on the draft 2026 S&Gs. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

184031

Commentaire fait au nom

The Ontario Archaeological Society

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Ontario Archaeological Society would like to express its disappointment regarding the updated Standards and Guidelines as outlined in the ERO Posting 026-0216. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

184032

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I’m glad the ministry finally is going to submit revisions to the S&Gs. Some things are good but some things are lacking. As a licensed archaeologist, here is my take. Glossary and Terms: changes were a good choice and are meaningful. No issue here Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

184033

Commentaire fait au nom

Woodland Heritage Northeast Ltd.

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Thank you for this opportunity to comment, I had written and posted earlier about the impacts of the currently proposed draft S&Gs, and their forthcoming effect on the development community. My colleagues encouraged me to post to you my summary table of issues, which I have attached below. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

184034

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am a Licenced Consultant Archaeologist (LCAs) with nearly 20 years of experience in the industry. One of the goals of the Heritage Framework Transformation (HFT) was to streamline archaeological assessments to facilitate development. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

184035

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Marine Heritage Committee

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Dear Heritage Framework Transformation Team, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

184036

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I support the revision and updating of Ontario's archaeological approving system; however, given the impacts of the changes, the proposed amendments require further consultation with those working in the discipline, such as consultant archaeologists, proponents, and Indigenous partners, all of whom Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

184038

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
1. Proposed changes to the Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

184039

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
There are many issues that are to be highlighted with this new draft of these standards for LCA’s to follow. Here are some concerns: Stage 1 Assessments Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

184040

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a professionally licensed consultant archaeologist working in Ontario for over 20 years, I am submitting the following feedback and concerns about the updated Standards and Guidelines that were posted on the Cultural Heritage industry on March 6th, 2026. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

184041

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am writing in to provide comment on the ERO posting regarding changes to the MCM Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists (S&Gs). Lire davantage