Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81501

Commentaire fait au nom

Township of King

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
At its Council meeting of December 12, 2022, Council of the Township of King received and approved recommendations as outlined in Growth Management Services Department, Planning Division Report GMS-PL-2022-48 regarding “Review of Changes to support Ontario's More Homes Built Faster: Ontario's Housin Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81526

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Burlington

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Parkway Belt West Plan includes lands within the City of Burlington. The City commends the Province for considering an opportunity to examine the revocation of the Parkway Belt West Plan. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81670

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am deeply disturbed that Bill 23 has passed. The removal of trees in ecologically sensitive areas does not make any sense at all. The government proposes to introduce a policy for the “offsetting” of wetlands, woodlands and other natural features. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81677

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
These proposed policy changes are both disastrous and unnecessary. They will weaken environmental protections, infringe on Indigenous rights, limit public involvement in land-use planning and decision making, remove cities’ green building standards and remove farmland needed for food production. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81684

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is one of the stupidest and most short-sighted proposals I have ever seen. 1. The greenbelt is irreplaceable. Only a fool would mess with it. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81696

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am submitting a comment on the proposed revocation of the Parkway Belt West Plan 1978 on behalf of my client, Sixth Oak Inc., which is a property owner in Part of Lot 16, Concession 2, North of Dundas Street, Town of Oakville. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81730

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Do these plans remove land from the existing or former Greenbelt for development? Do these plans destroy wetland for development? If yes then I would like to register my opposition to the plan with this comment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81738

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
“Do these plans remove land from the existing or former Greenbelt for development? Do these plans destroy wetland for development? If yes, then I would like to register my opposition to the plan with this comment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81781

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I'm concerned about the loss of park land and green open space in Vaughan with the proposed revocation of the Parkway Belt West Plan. The open space and recreational areas around the 407 Highway ETR are used frequently by hikers, joggers and walkers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81801

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I would like to have greater clarity on what this Provincial Government intends to do with the lands freed by annuling the current legislation/planning guidelines. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81807

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
With all due respect, Bill 23 threatens wildlife in Ontario! Bill 23 and other proposed legislative and policy changes would affect natural heritage conservation, urban and rural land-use planning, and environmental protections through multiple and complex changes to: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81836

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please do not revoke the Parkway Belt West Plan. It was created by the visionary Premier Bill Davis decades ago and has served our province and the adjacent communities well. This green corridor is an essential wildlife corridor and green space that provides so many benefits to Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81857

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I do not trust that the Doug Ford government has the interests of the public as foremost in their minds in all of their pro-development changes as of late. Lire davantage