Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170511

Commentaire fait au nom

Legal Advocates for Nature's Defence

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Legal Advocates for Nature’s Defence and the Friends of the Attawapiskat River jointly provide these comments (see attached) to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks in response to the following proposals, posted to the Environmental Registry of Ontario on September 26, 2025: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170514

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I don’t agree with Bill 5 and the changes that have been made. It is our responsibility to protect the animals in our environment for generations to come. Please repeal Bill 5.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170518

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This act is a woefully inadequate replacement to the Endangered Species Act that will cost an immense, irreplaceable loss of life, habitats, and ecosystems. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170519

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I support the proposed changes and hope that the promised streamlining and clarity will be a reality. Presently, the process is inconsistent, unclear, and in the end I do not think it actually helps species or their habitat. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170522

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
strongly oppose the proposed legislative and regulatory amendments that would allow the federal government to unilaterally determine which species are classified as endangered. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170523

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Our cowardly government officials only care about money and it's disgusting. They are trying to take over a world that is not theirs. The government is supposed to work for our benefit, not their own bank accounts. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170524

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
These amendments threaten the foundation of Canada’s conservation framework by prioritizing politics over protection. Species designation should remain in the hands of independent scientific bodies, not government actors with economic incentives. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170525

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The proposal to centralize endangered species decisions within the government is a blatant conflict of interest. We cannot trust the same entity that approves extractive projects, highways, and deforestation to also determine which species deserve protection. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170526

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I do not support this proposal. Rather than significantly weakening protections for species at risk, this government should be safeguarding biodiversity, respecting Indigenous rights and ensuring local communities benefit from the ecosystem services that nature freely provides. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170527

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
These amendments represent a quiet coup against environmental accountability. If passed, they will weaken oversight, dilute transparency, and gut the legal protections that ecosystems depend on. The removal of 106 species is not administrative efficiency—it’s an extinction event by legislation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170528

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Every species proposed for removal from the endangered list deserves individualized review, not a mass erasure. This regulatory amendment treats biodiversity like a bureaucratic inconvenience. Once a species disappears, it cannot be restored. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170529

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The long-term cost of removing species protections cannot be measured in dollars—it will be paid in ecological collapse. Pollinators, keystone species, culturally significant animals—once gone, their absence will ripple through food webs, water cycles, and communities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170530

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This proposal directly undermines Canada’s commitment to biodiversity protection. Delegating control of endangered species classifications to the government removes the objectivity and scientific rigor that this process demands. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170531

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Removing 106 species from the endangered list is not a neutral act—it’s an environmental massacre dressed in legal language. Every species lost under this amendment is a rupture in the balance of life. Biodiversity is not a luxury, it’s a life-support system. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170532

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Public trust in environmental legislation depends on transparency, scientific independence, and the recognition that ecological collapse is a present danger—not a distant hypothetical. These amendments threaten all three. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170533

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Canada is already failing to meet biodiversity targets. Instead of doubling down on protection, this proposal invites disaster. Rolling back species protections en masse is a fast track to collapse. We are witnessing a mass extinction event in real time—this amendment would pour fuel on that fire. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

170534

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Species don’t have lobbyists. That’s why the law must speak for them. This amendment silences that voice by removing independent science from the process and allowing government interests to decide who lives and who disappears. Lire davantage