Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

126550

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Ford government has shown by Ontario Place and The Science Center that they can't be trusted to uphold the already in place guidelines for endangered species or environmental protection let alone giving them free reign to ignore guidelines and assesments.. Read more

Comment ID

126554

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is dishonest and gives developers free reign to do what they want. We need to live in balance with the harmony and the endangered species act as is the last remaining hope for our wildlife. Read more

Comment ID

126557

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The approach to the protection and conservation of species at risk SHOULD be complicated, and it should take a lot of effort and expertise to decide how a new building development impacts the ecology of our province. Read more

Comment ID

126558

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It is outrageous that a government that has shown time and again that it is incapable of doing due diligence in establishing how to safely and/or efficiently begin construction projects is trying to "cut red tape," around endangered species in this province. Read more

Comment ID

126559

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
To whom this may concern, I am writing to express that I am extremely opposed to the proposed changes to the endangered species act. These protections are in place for a reason and need to be upheld. Read more

Comment ID

126560

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
So simply registering online allows a company or person to do what they want? Do they just check a box and claim there are no endangered species in the area that they know of? If they lie, it could not be proven in court so registering is useless. Read more

Comment ID

126562

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Ontario government should not be interfering in independent, science-based committees such as the COSSARO. The leadership of the current Ontario government has shown itself to prioritize short-term economic and political benefits. Read more

Comment ID

126564

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The proposed interim changes to the Ontario Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA) and the Species Conservation Act, 2025 could have several negative impacts on Ontario’s biodiversity, ecosystems, and communities. Read more

Comment ID

126565

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Replace the ontario trillium logo with a dollar sign because thats what this act shows is priority. Dumb act that only benefits a few and will make life harder for the average citizen.

Comment ID

126567

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am a scientist. There is great danger in making changes to this act. We can never bring species or habits back after they have been destroyed. The current system may take time- but it is far more important to protect species then it is to make a fast buck. Read more

Comment ID

126571

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Thinking that this approach puts development and economic gain over protection and long term conservation efforts. Wildlife and it's related habitats are fragile and once disturbed they are vulnerable. Read more

Comment ID

126572

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is absolute garbage which places the profits of developers ahead of preservation of our environment. This should treated as illegal instead the government is pushing an agenda to essentially "pave over anything". Absolutely disgusting.

Comment ID

126578

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is a deplorable act brought on by a corrupt administration and PREMIER! Only has his pocket and friends in mind! It is crucial we keep protecting species and land at risk! Stop going backwards!

Comment ID

126579

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
My summary of why this is deeply troubling: 1. Undermines Science-Based Protections: It allows politicians to override independent scientific assessments, opening the door to decisions driven by politics or industry, not ecology. 2. Guts Habitat Protections: Read more