Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

150438

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As a resident and taxpayer of The Township of West Grey, I strongly oppose allowing Walker aggregates permission to remove a maximum of 2,890,800,000 litres of water, per year, for a maximum of 10 years, from the aquifer at lot 19, concession 5 NDR. Read more

Comment ID

150441

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We as a property owner are not allowed to do anything water related, take from, reconstruct….. I absolutely disagree that a gravel pit should be allowed to take from the saugeen! If they cannot dig a well like a home owner is required to do then they should not draw from that source!!! Period!!!

Comment ID

150442

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing in objection to the issuance of a water permit for Walker Aggregates. We rely on our fresh water and we need to preserve it. Walker aggregates should not be permitted to take millions of liters of water 24 hours a day. Please consider the negative impact over time. Read more

Comment ID

150445

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As a landowner within 300 metres of the Saugeen River, we oppose this application. We expect the government at all levels work to protect the environment and wildlife surrounding the two waterways affected by this application. Priceville, Ontario Read more

Comment ID

150447

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is unacceptable! This is a massive amount of water. With the lady pot that went in (now closed) we saw our water table and well affected. We live about a mile and a half from where that pit was. This is a much larger volume, and will surely adversely impact a much wider area.

Comment ID

150454

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
What a sneaky, Slimy way of doing business. The consulting firm that came around 3 weeks after the permit was applied for.. acted as if he knew nothing of the proposal. What a disgrace. I have been in areas that have had water permits changed. They have resulted in wells drying up.. Read more

Comment ID

150469

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is absolutely unacceptable. The environmental damage these proposed extractions will cause is disastrous. Our wildlife and waters deserve protection. Please rethink this and listen to environmentalists and concerned citizens. It could cause irreparable damage. Read more