Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

150646

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
After reading through the proposal summary it is very clear to me that it makes the case for NOT approving this new permit. The proposal states that , if approved, it will have the ' highest potential of causing unacceptable environmental impactor interference'. Read more

Comment ID

150649

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
vote no for Walkers to use the Pond Water. Find/think of another way... I'm sure if you actually put your mind to it, there is a better way. KEEP THINKING,NO MORE EXCUSES. ALL THIS RUN AROUND WE CONTINUE TO HEAR IS BECOMING A BIT MUCH DON'T YOU THINK? Read more

Comment ID

150663

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As is well known, a Permit to take Water, or PTTW, can have a broad reaching impact. Of vital importance is the depth of the pond and the level to which the water will be drawn, as this will be the determining factor in the cone of influence of the drawdown. Read more

Comment ID

150678

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am a resident that lives close to this impacted site. I have significant concerns that this is a category 3 that is anticipated to have the highest potential of causing unacceptable environmental impactor interference. Our entire community and many in surrounding areas rely solely on well water. Read more

Comment ID

150680

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There is a lot of pressure to license even more gravel pits in the vicinity of the Walker operation and so it is somewhat shocking that a water taking application of this magnitude: up to 7,920 000 litres daily , every day for 10 years- can just be applied for as an amendment to a license without n Read more