Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70010

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I urge the Premier to; - withdraw the plan to remove lands from the Greenbelt; - follow through with a meaningful Greenbelt expansion that reflects public input - promised but not delivered by the Ford government Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70011

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

York Region has designated enough land area to meet your housing targets for the area. They can build higher densities on those lands if need be but by no means should any more greenbelt be opened up for development. Nature provides a buffer for extreme weather. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70014

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a bruce trial user, a resident who lives adjacent to green belt land, an avid outdoors person, as well as mother who will have children looking to purchase their first home in the next ten years, I strongly oppose this act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70020

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Do not develop the greenbelt. Honestly, in this day and age, given everything we know about the negative impact of environmental degradation, it absolutely boggles my mind that developing what little nature we have left is a good idea. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70026

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please do not do this! The Greenbelt is protected land. We owe it to everyone, but especially to the Indigenous Peoples who were robbed of this land and future generations of all people residing in Ontario, to protect the Greenbelt and prevent further damage to the environment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70032

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am 100% opposed to any building on greenbelt land in Ontario. We should be reducing our immigration targets, especially in ONTARIO, so that we do not need to encroach on our important greenbelt areas. Giving up greenbelt at the expense of housing is wrong!! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70036

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The greenbelt is there for a reason. It protects critical waterways, plant and animal species. It should not be added to ever-expanding city limits. We are in a climate emergency, and your solution is to destroy natural areas. This is contradictory. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70037

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Stop bill 23. I have deep concern about the disastrous effects Bill 23 will have on our greenspace, farmlands, watersheds and natural systems. Bill 23 will not build affordable housing but will increase property taxes and sprawl. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70041

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is an environmentally significant land and it is preposterous to give this away to developers. It is shortsighted and destructive to the environment. GTA is already becoming a concrete jungle and more highways/houses will not solve the problem. Build better transit instead.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70047

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am against this proposed greenbelt annex. There is plenty of property available for development that is not part of the greenbelt. All this looks like is a windfall for developers/PC donors.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70056

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to using any Greenbelt land for any kind of development. This land is protected for a reason and there must be no exceptions for this - it will set an extremely concerning precedent.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70061

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There is already a 30-year supply of land for housing in the Greater Golden Horseshoe, so there is NO need to remove any lands from the Greenbelt, which was envisioned to remain PERMANENTLY PROTECTED. Lire davantage