Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32549

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 108 appears to override the City planning process and replace it with much less regulated policies. In the past the OMB frequently attempted to dismiss the City planners to such an extent that the previous Liberal Government moved ahead to reduce the powers of the OMB. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32569

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I mirror these remarks after making a slight modification. At the outset, I need to say I am a Swing Voter, best choice each Election, so no allegiances to any party. I believe in the right of Municipal jurisdictions to determine land use as they represent the constituents in the community Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32570

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I mirror these remarks after making a slight modification. At the outset, I need to say I am a Swing Voter, best choice each Election, so no allegiances to any party. I believe in the right of Municipal jurisdictions to determine land use as they represent the constituents in the community Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32593

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Stop giving more power to builders. Allow local government to protect its cultural and heritage sites. Bill 108 is a bad idea.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32598

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly object the the passing of Bill 108. Planning needs to be in the hands of municipalities. Not a central agency controlled by the Ontario government. New building and construction should not encroach of green spaces. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32644

Commentaire fait au nom

The Corporation of the Municipality of Neebing

Statut du commentaire

Submitted by Rosalie Evans, Solicitor-Clerk, Municipality of Neebing. (Note that these are the Solicitor-Clerk's comments from a Northern, Rural, Small municipality perspective. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32649

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed regulations related to additional residential units are positive improvements that should be adopted. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32681

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The reduction in the approval time periods should not be made retroactive to the date of Royal Assent. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32682

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Hamilton

Statut du commentaire

The following are the City’s comments: Transition LPAT Appeals • Two regulatory changes include: • Revoking Ontario Regulation 102/18 “Planning Act Appeals”; and, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32717

Commentaire fait au nom

Drewlo Holdings Inc. (Developer & Rental Housing Provider)

Statut du commentaire

Drewlo Holdings Inc. commends the Province on the changes to the Planning Act, particularly changes in relation to the timelines that applications should be processed. We implore the Province to make these changes effective immediately. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32745

Commentaire fait au nom

Town of Tecumseh

Statut du commentaire

Please refer to attached PDF document for the Town of Tecumseh's formal submission regarding the proposed Bill 108 regulations. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32772

Commentaire fait au nom

Regional Municipality of Halton

Statut du commentaire

*REVISED SUBMISSION* Good Afternoon, As a follow up to our submission submitted yesterday, inadvertently the wrong Attachment #1 was included in the submission. I have attached a revised version of our submission with the correct attachment. Please disregard the copy submitted yesterday. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32773

Commentaire fait au nom

County of Oxford

Statut du commentaire

To Whom it May Concern, Re: Proposed Planning Act Regulation with respect to Bill 108 Implementation EBR Posting 019-0181 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32789

Commentaire fait au nom

The Corporation of the City of Barrie

Statut du commentaire

1. The reduction for decision timelines on applications for official plan amendments, zoning by-law amendments and plans of subdivision should apply to complete applications submitted after Proclamation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32790

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Toronto

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of the City of Toronto, I am pleased to submit comments from the City regarding the proposed regulation and regulatory changes under the Planning Act related to Bill 108, the More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019. Lire davantage