Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81104

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Greenbelt is a very important space for all Ontarians. If the Greenbelt is disrupted due to development, there will be irreparable harm to the ecosystems and the wildlife that live there. We will never be able to get those ecosystems in the habitat for sensitive organisms back. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81109

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Building homes is important but cannot come at the long term quality of life of Ontarians. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81122

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to section 019-6172 of bill 23. It removes thousands of hectares of previously protected lands from Ontario’s Greenbelt and passes the costs of infrastructure from the already wealthy developers onto tax paying Ontarions. This bill must be recalled.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81126

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

1. Most residents of the Kitchener-Waterloo region experience a dearth of parkland at present. We cannot tolerate a reduction in the parkland dedication rate. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81130

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to the changes in this act. Since the changes will remove development fees and download big dollars to municipalities allowing development companies to pocket more profits at the community members expense. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81132

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I don’t agree that reducing development charges will enable houses to be built faster. I think that developers are only interested in building fewer high-priced homes. The only way around that is for the government to provide incentives for developers to build what we require at the moment i.e. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81137

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for this opportunity to respond to Bill 23 implementation.  I will address several aspects of the bill.1.  By far the most far-reaching and dangerous aspect is the restriction of Conservation Authorities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81152

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am quoting from the Waterloo Region Record as published on Friday 9, as follows: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81154

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please do not proceed with this. It is reckless and not very well thought out. It seems to benefit mostly the developers and not the people who are in need. Not to mention the devastation to nature and biodiversity. Thank-you. Kathy

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81156

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would like to express my support of this proposal. We do not need to open new lands for development. there are large enough land areas to support required housing needs.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81160

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This Bill, in an effort to build so called "affordable housing" seems to be throwing out all the steps of good planning and consultation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81161

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I object to this Bill. The Bill is very complicated and far to detailed to be rushed through in this manner. The public and experts need an opportunity to read through the Bill and understand it fully before it should be passed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81162

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed changes to development charges shift the burden onto taxpayers – whereas the already-very-rich developers are the ones who are laughing all the way to the bank. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81178

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposed action is unjust beyond measure. How are we citizens of Ontario to safeguard our clean drinking water, ensure access to green space for all, protect lands that have fed us for decades, and trust our interests are at heart in this greed based move by the Ford government. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81187

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The research is there that as people we need green space for our mental and physical health. Do not be motivated solely by money and building corporations. Please think of the people, and of the planet. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81197

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please do not proceed with the absurd changes being proposed to the Planning Act and Development Charges. Please also repeal Bill 23 - it simply is not in the best public interest or to the benefit of our province - just selected developers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81202

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We all need urban parkland. I urge you to maintain the current rate of 1 hectare for 300 dwellling units. During the height of COVID, we saw how vital parkland was to people's mental health. Parkland use increased exponentially. People need a break from 'the urban jungle.' Lire davantage